Ukrainian parliament member Serhiy Vlasenko has voiced strong criticism of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP), claiming they prioritize media engagement over substantive investigations. Vlasenko argues that these agencies often disclose case details publicly, effectively declaring suspects guilty before a court ruling.
According to Vlasenko, the focus on public relations detracts from the agencies’ ability to conduct thorough and impartial investigations. He stated, “They operate in the PR realm. Ninety percent of their activity is directed at media. Unfortunately, I see neither effectiveness nor professionalism in their work.”
He further pointed out that it seems easier for NABU and SAP to hold press conferences and share case details than to meticulously gather evidence and build a strong case for prosecution.
As a contrast, Vlasenko referenced the practices of European law enforcement agencies, which typically refrain from commenting on case specifics until investigations are complete and materials are submitted to court.
Vlasenko also raised concerns regarding the independence of Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies. He questioned the absence of the head of NABU’s detective group, who has reportedly been in the United States for a month, asking, “What is he doing there? Why do our anti-corruption law enforcement agencies need to report to embassies? Are they truly independent?”
Related News:
- Proposal to Increase Fines for Language Law Violations in Ukraine
- Potential Changes to Asylum Rights for Ukrainian Men in Europe
- Ukrainians Can Now Check Travel Restrictions Online
Ukrainian lawmaker Serhiy Vlasenko has criticized the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office for focusing on media publicity rather than thorough investigations. He questions their independence and effectiveness, urging a more professional approach to anti-corruption efforts.