The leader of the opposition party Tisza, Péter Mádjár, outlined his vision for Hungary during a press conference in Budapest following the parliamentary elections. His remarks touched on constitutional reforms, foreign policy, and Hungary’s relationship with Ukraine and Russia.
Mádjár announced plans to amend Hungary’s constitution to limit the prime minister’s tenure to two terms, equating to a maximum of eight years in office. However, he did not clarify whether this limitation would apply to consecutive terms or the total duration served.
Addressing the current Minister of Foreign Affairs, Péter Szijjártó, Mádjár stated that Szijjártó had not left the country but was present in Budapest, allegedly at the ministry where he was reportedly destroying important documents related to sanctions.
On the topic of Ukraine’s potential accession to the European Union, Mádjár expressed opposition to expedited membership, citing the ongoing conflict in Ukraine as a significant barrier. He emphasized that all countries should undergo the same accession process and indicated that Hungary would hold a referendum on the matter when it becomes relevant.
Regarding relations with Russia, Mádjár stated, “If Putin calls me, I will answer. But I will not call him myself. I will tell him to stop the bloodshed, as Hungarians have also died—Hungarian-speaking people in Ukraine.” He described Hungary’s future relationship with Russia as pragmatic, noting that the government would review all existing contacts and terminate them if necessary.
Finally, Mádjár commented on the proposed financial assistance to Ukraine, specifically the 90 billion euros under discussion. He asserted that this issue would not be addressed until his government is formed and indicated that Hungary would be excluded from negotiations among European partners regarding this financial package.
Péter Mádjár, Hungary's future prime minister, announced plans for constitutional reforms and addressed key foreign policy issues concerning Ukraine and Russia. His statements reflect a cautious approach to international relations and domestic governance.
