“Trump’s national security adviser named three key issues for ending the Russian war in Ukraine. He outlined the key issues for negotiations.”, — write on: unn.ua
Details
“The conflict needs to stop and President Trump has been clear about that and is determined to do so,” Waltz said on CBS’ Face the Nation on January 19.
When asked if there was a plan for how to stop the war, Waltz said he wouldn’t jump ahead of the curve, but outlined what he believed to be key questions: Who should be at the negotiating table? How to bring them to the negotiating table? What should be the boundaries of the agreement?
I’m not going to get ahead of myself with all of these things, but I’ll tell you the key — the key parts of it. First, who will we bring to the negotiating table? Second, how do we bring them to the negotiating table? And thirdly, what are the limits of the agreement?
“President Trump clearly states that the war must stop,” Volz noted and added that the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyi, also says he is ready to cooperate with Trump to stop the war.
Volz referred to the fighting in this war as a “killing field”, combining both the methods of conducting the First World War and the risks of the war escalating to the Third World War.
“This is the trench warfare of the First World War, a real meat grinder, when people run across open fields in the east of Ukraine. However, with the escalating consequences of the Third World War,” Volz said.
Speaking about the risks of escalation, a member of Trump’s team noted that the war is “expanding” and “North Korea is sending tens of thousands of troops, South Korea is upset and talking about some involvement.”
Addition
On January 8, another contender for a high position in the Trump administration, Keith Kellogg, whom the newly elected president plans to appoint as a special representative for Ukraine and Russia, expressed his belief on the air of Fox News that as a result of the discussions, the parties will be able to come to a decision on the settlement of the “crisis” and the end of the “massacre” ” and advised to analyze the results of such an intention for 100 days of work of the new administration.