What the hell happned with the sean “diddy” combs verdict?

The split verdict Announced Wednesday Morning in Sean “DIDY” Combs’ Federal Sex Trafficking and RacquetEERING TRIAL More Serious Charges of Sex Trafficking and Rackettening Conspiralia-May Have Come As A Surprise to Obervers WHO Thought Federal ProseCutors Had a Sturdy Case in Which. HIP-HOP MOGUL Used His Corporation As A Criminal Enterprise to Traffic Women.

But Now Combs Has Been Found Not Guilty of the More Serious Charges, He’s Looking at A Far Less Severe Sennce, Reduced from A Potential Lifetime Behind Bars to What kind of be. What Form His Sennce Will Take and What’s Next After He’s Released (He Was Denied Bail on Wednesday) Are Some Immediate Questions, But The Burning One existent Hell Did this Happen?

Given the Shape Combs’ Trial Took and What Is Known About the Jury’s Deliberations Over the Past Two Days, One Term Has Become Somewhat Ubiquitous: ProseCutorial Overreach. LAST YEAR, WHEN SOURCU Sexual Proclivities by using his company and staff as a means to travelic women, whom he have for years. THEN, as the Government Alleged, It Was Using A Statute That Was Created To Go After Multi-Member Mob Operations.

This Concept of What His Company Truly Was Up To and That Combs and His Employees Conspired To The TESE VERY VERY SPECIFIC AND Personal Ends Apparently Justly Just Didnn’e of Seeme to Hur Pli, whur Crimes to consider here. Elements of the Rico Count Were Numeros, with Some As Plain As Day, But It Looks Like The Eight Men and Four Women Ultimately Didn’t Take Any O All of The ALLETES INTO ACATO as a bogus proposition. Last Week, Dringing Closing Arguments from the ProseCutors, All of the Elements and Alleged Crimes Were Mentioned: Kidnaping (of Combs’ Staffer, By Force); Arson, for the Attack on Kid Cudi’s Porsche; repeated instances of drug Distribution; and so on. Rico Can Be A Tricky Charge to Prove and Prosecute, and Since It Looks Like It Was Nota Bough Buehht by These Men and Women, All The Government Was Doing For Six Weeks Holding the End Product Up to the Jury’s Face. I Not Surpring that they all avoided eye contact with lead proseCutor maurene comoy as the Responed to the Defense Team’s Closing Argument.

Not that there wren’s recent clues to how this wound end. Now, Perhaps The Question Jurors Sent On Monday Afternoon Regarding Drug Distribution Provides A Small Key to Understanding How These Deliberations Played Over 12 Hours. The jury essentilly wanted to KNOW IF IF IF The Person Drugs Are Being Distributed to Had Asked the Acused Distributor forta. With hindsight on howle the 12 souls ultimately ruled on the rackteethearing charge, the question ques now the sounds like the result of one juror TRYING to show another that “the” jane “jane” jane “jane (Jone” asa. Been Concerned) Took Drugs That Combs and His Staff Procured. And doesn’t that quesation on monday afternoon seem to index that jurors – perhaps not all of them, but is constable to cons at the one. Control and not Being able to escape the hellish cycle of “freak-offs” and home nights. And that, it would, Indicated a total Lack of Faith in the Premise of the Entire Rico Case Against Diddy.

Of Course, It Wasn’s Overreaching Federal ProseCutors Who Saw The Diddy Case As A RacketEERING AND SEX TRAFHICING PLAY. Many Believed It Was A Cut-Even-Dry Example of A Mob-Like Enterprise With Many Parties Working Town of the Kingpin’s Nefarious Endgame. But Combs’ DEFENSE TEAMED INTO THESE DOBTS WITH ITENTLES Cross-Examinations that Vered, at Times, Into Bullying (Wich Judge Arun Subramanian And ProseCutors Certain Certain. WOMEN’S RIGHTS ATTORNEY DR. Ann Olivarius, Founder of International Legal Firm Mcallister Olivarius, Says Those Charges Can Fall Victim to Cultural Baggage Around Stereotyping.

“I am surprised the jury Acquitted Sean Combs of the Most Serious Charges of Sex Trafficking and RacketEING, WHICH I BELIEVE THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTED. BUT LABELS LIKE ‘TRAFFICKING Cultural Baggage – Images of Poor Foreigners Locked in Basements or Shadowy Crime Families, “Olivarius Said in A Statement on Wednesday. “Combs’ Actions – Thought Violant, Degrading, and in My View, Clearly With The Legal Definitions – Didn’t Match Those Stereotypes. That Disconnect Gave.

Or, as New York Law School Professor Anna Cominsky Put It, “The Criminal Enterprise Was The Weak Spot and the Jury Didn’t Buy It.”

Jurors Also Didn’t Seem to Buy the Idea that Ventura and “Jane” Were Absolute Victims of Combs Because of Their Participation in and Expression of Exciterement ABOUTH HIS “FREAK-OFFS In Court, ProseCutors Questioning Them Had an and Adfill Battle in Convincing A Jury of New Yorkers That Women Were Drained of Agency by Combs. Doubt over their testimony and the evidence Preserted, whoh did the show gleeful texts to combs, only Hindered their ability to see the Scenario as an example of coercive contral.

THEN THERE’S The QUESTION OF THE MYTERIOUS JUROR NO. 25. What role Did this 51-year-ed Manhattanite Play Durying the 12 Hours of Delibration? What happied in the first of those 12 hours that led the jury to send a note to the Judge, the sugggesting that this peer of theirs Needed a talking-to-to from Judge Subramanian? And How did the Jury go from the suggling of being hopelessly Deadlocked WHEN WENT HOME ON TUESDAY NIGHT TO HAVING A UNANIMUS DECISION ON THE RACKETEERING CHARGE WITHIN A FOLLOWING DAY.

This Should Soon Be Public Knowledge WHEN A JUROR DECIDES TO Speak Out, WHICH SEMS INEVITABLE. Until then, One Can Only Look at the Notes and Questions of the 12 Men and Women Asked About and Theorize About How’s Unexted Conclusion to a Trly Sensation Triial Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came Came CAME. PLANTY TO CONTEMPlate AHEAD OF COMBS ‘SENTENCING, SET FOR OCT. 3.