“Three Bucha’s collaborators who worked for the Russians, the court decided to release more than 900 thousand UAH. Despite the prohibition of the law to determine the pledge for the accused in the state community. As the human rights initiative “Razlator” informed, the Kyiv-Svyatoshinsky district court of Kyiv region on March 25, 2025 chose a measure of restraint for three residents”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Three collaborators from Buchawho worked on Russians, The court decided into let in freedom Collateral in more than 900 thousand. UAH. Despite the ban on the law to determine the pledge for the accused in the state community.
As reported On March 25, 2025, the Kyiv-Svyatoshinsky District Court of Kyiv region, Kyiv-Svyatoshinsky district court of Kyiv region, chose a measure of restraint for three residents of Mikhailivka-Rubezhivka of Buchan district: detention with an alternative to a bail of 908,400 UAH for everyone. They are judged for cooperation with the enemy during the occupation.
Thus, in March 2022, during the occupation of Mikhailivka-Rubezhivka (Buchan district, Kyiv region), three local residents-Vladimir Uzbek, Stefan Slabinsky and Andriy Olyfiets-according to the investigation:
- cooperated with the Russian military;
- transferred to the occupiers the looted property;
- gave the enemy the stolen cars (Toyota RAV4, Jaguar);
- used these cars to transport weapons and ammunition;
- They used violence to local who disagreed with the army of the Russian Federation.
All three are accused of articles:
- Part 2 of Art. 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – State betrayal;
- Part 3 of Art. 289 – illegal seizure of transport;
- Part 2 of Art. 125 – injury.
“On March 25, 2025, the court (presiding judge – Alexander Grishko) made a decision that is contrary to common sense and requirements of the law: a preventive measure in the form of detention was preserved, but with an alternative – a pledge of 908 400 UAH for each of the accused”, – the human rights activists said.
As it is noted, in the “lawmaker”, in the conditions of martial law in accordance with Part 6 of Art. 176 of the CPC of Ukraine the possibility of leaving the accused in the state community should be excluded.
In addition, the participants of the process record a number of actions that indicate a deliberate weakening of the prosecution:
- The prosecutor did not maintain an active position in court – did not ask questions, did not comment on risks;
- refused to attach photodocasis, despite the direct remark of the court, and then this photo was in the accused;
- He informally welcome and communicated with the accused;
- He publicly stated that he did not see in their actions the composition of the State Council, which is contrary to his indictment.
“It’s not just a court error. This is a precedent that legalizes the schemes of collaborators for money. During a full -scale war, when part of Ukraine is still under occupation, the dismissal of the accused in the state community for 900 thousand hryvnias is not only a legal but also a moral catastrophe, “the lawmaker said.
Earlier, Ukrainian police investigators reported Two more Russian military is suspected of murder and abuse with civilian population in Bucha. Among the persons are a Russian intelligence officer who shot a 40-year-old civilian in Bucha, and a military Russian military who mercilessly beat the local resident, demanding to give him a 12-year-old daughter.
Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine He directed To court, indictments regarding the two servicemen of the 234th Airborne Assault Regiment of the 76th Airborne Assault Division of the Airborne troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. They are accused of violating the laws and customs of war, combined with a premeditated murder that occurred during the capture of Bucha.
