“On April 28, the National Bank of Ukraine recognized the business reputation of Petro Poroshenko, a majority shareholder of the International Investment Bank, and “unhappy”. This is stated in a statement published on the website of the European Solidarity Party. The reason for this decision was sanctions imposed against the policy of the National Security and Defense Council and put into force by President Vladimir Zelensky’s decree. Poroshenko himself stated that this decision was illegal and”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
On April 28, the National Bank of Ukraine recognized the business reputation of Petro Poroshenko, a majority shareholder of the International Investment Bank, and “unhappy”.
This is stated in a statement published on the site of the European Solidarity Party.
The reason for this decision was sanctions imposed against the policy of the National Security and Defense Council and put into effect by President Vladimir Zelensky’s decree. Poroshenko himself stated that this decision was illegal and has a political basis.
In a statement published on the website of the European Solidarity Party, Poroshenko stressed that the consideration of his “unseenable reputation” indicates serious problems with the reputation of the National Bank himself. He emphasized that the NBU Constitution should be an independent regulator, but in his opinion, he actually became the executor of a political order.
The politician believes that preventive sanctions imposed by the President were the basis for the decision, although there were no violations on his part.
Poroshenko also noted that recognizing him as “a person with an unspeakable business reputation” is part of the campaign to cleanse the political field and create obstacles to the opposition. He regarded the NBU’s actions as “flashy, shameful abuse of power and violation of the law.”
According to the politician, this testifies to the preparation of power for elections and at the same time weakens the country in the face of aggression of Russia.
The National Bank explained that NSDC sanctions have become a direct basis for such a decision, because the owners of significant participation in banks should have a perfect business reputation.
At the same time, the NBU emphasized that this does not in any way affect the work of the International Investment Bank and fulfill its obligations to clients.
Poroshenko’s defense stated that neither lawyers nor people’s deputies were allowed at the meeting of the NBU Committee, which, in their opinion, was a violation of the law. The politician himself at this time was on a working visit to Spain.
The lawyers stressed that the NBU’s decision opens the way to establish control of the bank, where Poroshenko is a shareholder, although the legislation does not directly provide for such a mechanism.
Recall that the rapid end of active fighting in Ukraine is estimated as an unlikely risk for the updated NBU macro -forecast. Instead, there are high risks of escalation of hostilities, further destruction of production facilities.
We also reported that the Kryzhopilsky District Court of Vinnytsia Region began on April 29, the case of the division of property of Marina and Petro Poroshenkov’s property.
