“
I will say right away: there will be no mourning and, moreover, there will be no offensive speeches in this material.
Even before the tournament, the youth team of Ukraine fulfilled a great task: it has traditionally been strong at the youth level of Serbs, and beat the same English at home. Generally starting a group of 8 wins is very powerful, as it may be a word now.
In a group of euro, our youth lost to the Danish and the Dutch-two national teams, which, first, are much more football than us, and secondly, incredibly strong at the youth level. The Netherlands and Denmark have a deep, decades of football development for decades, the scouting system is completely incomparable to us – and in the case of “plowing”, of course, the colonial past plays a role.
UAF Our national team should not beat such opponents to order, simply at the expense of the class. As for the game, everyone who watched the match with the Dancers should understand that the game went for three results – and has been the most unusual for us. Just imagine: win ours in the first round – and in Ukraine it would be early first! 6 points after two rounds – and 3 only in Denmark, which lost us.
Yes, it happened. And what? Youth teams are needed not for victories, but for the development of players. In Ukraine, there may now be a shortage of anything, but there are definitely no shortage of young players who are already playing at the heart of strong teams. Dynamo, one can say, such players consist. And it also belongs to the “good” category: now not the times when young players from Shakhtar and Dynamo can only be seen in such tournaments.
Moreover, this unsuccessful euro can globally bring more benefits than a lot of success: Oleg The Overka is already interested in Espanyol. The midfielder was certainly one of the best in the team – but how successful the Tsitaishvili and Supryaga performed, who after winning the World Cup waited for offers from clubs, at best, the same level. Not to mention that 90% of the championship was in principle none of the fuel.
Why? Because the Melgos game scheme gives players to reveal, emphasizes their strongest sides. Not even the top club or even tops will be invited to “reflect the crowd. The coach managed the team competently, put creative football – and the scout scout score is not interested. The account is formed in many respects because of random mistakes – and they pass with the experience that all participants of the tournament still need to be acquired.
UAF Actors Against Denmark: Nescherty – Roman (Vyunnik, 54), goat, Batagov, Shepharenko – Ocheretko, Brazhko, Rubchinsky (Saluk, 64) – Bragar (Kvasnitsa, 80), Vanat, Voloshin.
Against Finland: Nescherty – goat (Saluk, 69), Batagov, Mikhavko, Shepharenko – Yarmolyuk, Brazhko, Ocheretko (Rubchinsky, 63) – Bragaru (Voloshin, 62), Vanat (Vyunnik, 69), Giant (Smolkov, 90+2).
Against the Netherlands: Nescherty – Krupsky (Kozik, 74), Batagov, Mikhavko, Shepharenko – Rubchinsky (Tsarenko, 65), Yarmolyuk, Ocheretko (Yatsyk, 74) – Bragaru, Vanat (Vyunnik, 65), Voloshin (Kvasnitsa, 81).
All matches came out 6 players: Neshcherty, Batagov, Shepharenko, Ocheretko, Vanat, Bragar. Of course, we remember the forced “exclusion” from the warehouse to the third match Brazhka, forced absence in the first Yarmoluk (Rubchinsky was played as himself, probably not expected!)-but in any case, Melgos showed flexibility. The game time was obtained by absolutely everyone except two spare goalkeepers. There were 15 different football players in the starting composition, and it is unlikely that they need to take into account only them – the same exit was replaced for 80 minutes.
Of course, the wyunnik did not just turn out. Vanat held the middle tournament, Voloshin was just weak, and additional options were needed (this explains the outputs of the kvassnytsya). A person who was unlikely to expect 232 minutes on the field – Bragar, who came from a very confident Dynamo stock. But this is also an indicator of the face that you want to see from Melgos’s youth: play forward, press, show modern football.
UAF Of course, it is a pity that Dania left many free areas and opportunities. Of course, the game of such a team would like to look against the Portuguese. But many of our “younger” national teams, even playing more matches in the tournaments, gave noticeably less food for the mind – and, most importantly, fewer players, which can be seriously talking about as an intensification. The Supragaga World Champion, which has played for the whole last season in dawn 335 minutes (of course, with zero of the heads), maybe if anything, confirm.
Therefore, we focus on the good.
The best player Almost non -alternative – Yegor Yarmolyuk. A wonderful match with Finns, the defeat is not exactly the fault of the Dutch – and, perhaps, the same fatal difference between three points and six, early victory and a lack of group was in his absence against Denmark. Unfortunately, the midfielder missed the first game of the tournament due to health problems.
The best scorer Two goals in three matches – an indicator of a good forward. Maxim Bragar exceeded the goals of the same vanata, for three games scored more heads than in 24 matches for Dynamo – because he met more trust (and he joined the attacks, honestly, more meaningfully). The question is always the benefit of Bragar with their goals – or harm open to the rivals by the flank.
The best assistantEspanyol is not just interested in. Of course, the reason number one sounds like “a player does not need a miner, Shakhtar, who has released cheap with Zycan, will invite inexpensively for an unnecessary player,” but nevertheless. Oleg Ocheretko went out to the start for all three matches, gave two goal broadcasts with Finns – and attracted attention.
The best goal Bragaru was scored above all praise. By the way, this is an excuse to raise the topic again: does it definitely prevail the result over the game in youth tournaments? Bragar, of course, was mistaken in defense even specifically with the Danes-but, first, it is possible to lose the Danes in a dry, closed, uninteresting game (Yakovenko, who scored 0 points on a youth euro with hemp, Yarmolenko, Rakitsky, Garmash, and a nationwide. to confirm), and secondly, even the result could not globally bring anything.
The undervalued part Yarmolyuk missed the first match, Brazhko – the third, and in the end with the strongest composition of the hawbeks, our players played only against the Finns. Of course, they were beaten, but they would like to look at such a field in confrontation with the strongest teams of the group. At the decisive moment, the Netherlands used a lot of freedom in the support area.
While in a number of aspects, Ukraine is moving away and moving away from the civilized world, its youth national team has finally began to resemble a modern European team. She plays exactly in more Interesting and meaningful football than the national team, even recognized grands are forced to count with it – and this is one of the things that should be proud of.
”, – WRITE: Champion.com.ua
I will say right away: there will be no mourning and, moreover, there will be no offensive speeches in this material.
Even before the tournament, the youth team of Ukraine fulfilled a great task: it has traditionally been strong at the youth level of Serbs, and beat the same English at home. Generally starting a group of 8 wins is very powerful, as it may be a word now.
In a group of euro, our youth lost to the Danish and the Dutch-two national teams, which, first, are much more football than us, and secondly, incredibly strong at the youth level. The Netherlands and Denmark have a deep, decades of football development for decades, the scouting system is completely incomparable to us – and in the case of “plowing”, of course, the colonial past plays a role.
UAF Our national team should not beat such opponents to order, simply at the expense of the class. As for the game, everyone who watched the match with the Dancers should understand that the game went for three results – and has been the most unusual for us. Just imagine: win ours in the first round – and in Ukraine it would be early first! 6 points after two rounds – and 3 only in Denmark, which lost us.
Yes, it happened. And what? Youth teams are needed not for victories, but for the development of players. In Ukraine, there may now be a shortage of anything, but there are definitely no shortage of young players who are already playing at the heart of strong teams. Dynamo, one can say, such players consist. And it also belongs to the “good” category: now not the times when young players from Shakhtar and Dynamo can only be seen in such tournaments.
Moreover, this unsuccessful euro can globally bring more benefits than a lot of success: Oleg The Overka is already interested in Espanyol. The midfielder was certainly one of the best in the team – but how successful the Tsitaishvili and Supryaga performed, who after winning the World Cup waited for offers from clubs, at best, the same level. Not to mention that 90% of the championship was in principle none of the fuel.
Why? Because the Melgos game scheme gives players to reveal, emphasizes their strongest sides. Not even the top club or even tops will be invited to “reflect the crowd. The coach managed the team competently, put creative football – and the scout scout score is not interested. The account is formed in many respects because of random mistakes – and they pass with the experience that all participants of the tournament still need to be acquired.
UAF Actors Against Denmark: Nescherty – Roman (Vyunnik, 54), goat, Batagov, Shepharenko – Ocheretko, Brazhko, Rubchinsky (Saluk, 64) – Bragar (Kvasnitsa, 80), Vanat, Voloshin.
Against Finland: Nescherty – goat (Saluk, 69), Batagov, Mikhavko, Shepharenko – Yarmolyuk, Brazhko, Ocheretko (Rubchinsky, 63) – Bragaru (Voloshin, 62), Vanat (Vyunnik, 69), Giant (Smolkov, 90+2).
Against the Netherlands: Nescherty – Krupsky (Kozik, 74), Batagov, Mikhavko, Shepharenko – Rubchinsky (Tsarenko, 65), Yarmolyuk, Ocheretko (Yatsyk, 74) – Bragaru, Vanat (Vyunnik, 65), Voloshin (Kvasnitsa, 81).
All matches came out 6 players: Neshcherty, Batagov, Shepharenko, Ocheretko, Vanat, Bragar. Of course, we remember the forced “exclusion” from the warehouse to the third match Brazhka, forced absence in the first Yarmoluk (Rubchinsky was played as himself, probably not expected!)-but in any case, Melgos showed flexibility. The game time was obtained by absolutely everyone except two spare goalkeepers. There were 15 different football players in the starting composition, and it is unlikely that they need to take into account only them – the same exit was replaced for 80 minutes.
Of course, the wyunnik did not just turn out. Vanat held the middle tournament, Voloshin was just weak, and additional options were needed (this explains the outputs of the kvassnytsya). A person who was unlikely to expect 232 minutes on the field – Bragar, who came from a very confident Dynamo stock. But this is also an indicator of the face that you want to see from Melgos’s youth: play forward, press, show modern football.
UAF Of course, it is a pity that Dania left many free areas and opportunities. Of course, the game of such a team would like to look against the Portuguese. But many of our “younger” national teams, even playing more matches in the tournaments, gave noticeably less food for the mind – and, most importantly, fewer players, which can be seriously talking about as an intensification. The Supragaga World Champion, which has played for the whole last season in dawn 335 minutes (of course, with zero of the heads), maybe if anything, confirm.
Therefore, we focus on the good.
The best player Almost non -alternative – Yegor Yarmolyuk. A wonderful match with Finns, the defeat is not exactly the fault of the Dutch – and, perhaps, the same fatal difference between three points and six, early victory and a lack of group was in his absence against Denmark. Unfortunately, the midfielder missed the first game of the tournament due to health problems.
The best scorer Two goals in three matches – an indicator of a good forward. Maxim Bragar exceeded the goals of the same vanata, for three games scored more heads than in 24 matches for Dynamo – because he met more trust (and he joined the attacks, honestly, more meaningfully). The question is always the benefit of Bragar with their goals – or harm open to the rivals by the flank.
The best assistantEspanyol is not just interested in. Of course, the reason number one sounds like “a player does not need a miner, Shakhtar, who has released cheap with Zycan, will invite inexpensively for an unnecessary player,” but nevertheless. Oleg Ocheretko went out to the start for all three matches, gave two goal broadcasts with Finns – and attracted attention.
The best goal Bragaru was scored above all praise. By the way, this is an excuse to raise the topic again: does it definitely prevail the result over the game in youth tournaments? Bragar, of course, was mistaken in defense even specifically with the Danes-but, first, it is possible to lose the Danes in a dry, closed, uninteresting game (Yakovenko, who scored 0 points on a youth euro with hemp, Yarmolenko, Rakitsky, Garmash, and a nationwide. to confirm), and secondly, even the result could not globally bring anything.
The undervalued part Yarmolyuk missed the first match, Brazhko – the third, and in the end with the strongest composition of the hawbeks, our players played only against the Finns. Of course, they were beaten, but they would like to look at such a field in confrontation with the strongest teams of the group. At the decisive moment, the Netherlands used a lot of freedom in the support area.
As long as a number of Aspes Ukraine is moving away and moving away from the civilized world, its youth team has finally started to resemble a modern European team. She accurately plays in more interesting and meaningful football than the national team, even recognized by even recognized grands – and this is one of the things that should be proud of.