“The Director of the National Anti -Corruption Bureau, Semen Krivonos, rejected the statement of the Security Service of Ukraine that the detained MP from the forbidden Party of the IPF Fedir Khristenko, who is suspected of treason, had a mechanism for influencing the Bureau’s leadership.”, – WRITE: www.pravda.com.ua
Source: Krivonos on the air of “Radio Liberty”
Details: The NABU Director assured that no “MP” has no influence on him or the bureau. According to Krivonos, he did not hear the name of Khrisenko in the walls of the National Anti -Corruption Bureau, but initiated an official investigation on the basis of the SBU’s statement.
Advertising:
Direct Language: “If the official investigation is moving on, objective facts of the crime will be established, for example, our employee and will make appropriate decisions. And I will apply to the Security Service of Ukraine to grant permission (this is important, because in the framework of official procedures we must obtain this permission), permission to disclose the public.
Details: Krivonos also stressed that there is no “wave” or “confrontation” of NABU with the SBU or other law enforcement agency, and the relationship with the head of the SBU Vasyl Mid is not hostile.
“We have a work relationship. We have no war. And all the statements that we came out of the standpoint of revenge are not true,” he said.
Prehistory:
- On July 21, it became known that NABU staff without court order took place in investigative actions conducted by the SBU staff and the Prosecutor General’s Office. Special forces and law enforcement officers conducted approximately 80 searches in 19 employees of the bureau in different regions of Ukraine.
- At the time of mass searches, the heads of both anti -corruption structures were on a business trip in London.
- Later, this was suspected by anti -corruption employees.
- On September 2, NABU and SAP declared suspicion of the former chief of the SBU Cybersecurity Department, Elijah Vityuk in illegal enrichment and unreliable declaration.
- The Security Service of Ukraine stated that she perceives the suspicion of the SBU General Ilya Vityuk as revenge on the part of anti -corruption bodies in response to the special service of several employees of the National Anti -Corruption Bureau at the end of July this year.
Read also: Anti -anticorruption special operation. That stands behind searches in Nabu
“How and by whom was the special operation to destroy NABU and SAP independence?”