“As a law # 56677, the defense is shared by the holiday and criminal.”, – WRITE: www.pravda.com.ua
And now – attention. Bill No. 56677 from 92 MPs proposes: if you are an enterprise included in a special list, then your activity does not fall under the Criminal Code. Even if you know, there are “formal signs” of the crime.
Well perfect. Because the war.
Advertising:
It smells not just selectivity – here is a true legal nihilism. The law says: if you are on the list – then the law is not about you. And if not on the list – then he is guilty, who did not have time, did not sign, did not formalize. This model completely undermines the trust in the institutions and creates a parallel reality, where the right regulates justice, but the proximity to the body. Otherwise it is not amnesty, but a ransom. And instead of the rule of law – we have the rule of the list.
The bill for their own, the rest is suspicious In the list – OPC. Manufacturers. Formally – those who provide the army. But not volunteers.
Not the drivers who pulled the cargo through the “gray zone” in the early days of a full -scale invasion.
Not commanders at zero who made decisions at their own risk.
Not the soldiers who were looking for equipment, because there was no time to wait for the tender. Not the brothers who repaired the equipment in the garages.
Not at night who wrote software for drones, they broke the enemy databases, tracked the movement of columns, raised servers from nothing, integrated the intelligence cards and built a digital front line when it was not even a name.
Not those who taught the AI to recognize Russian technology until the state has even heard the words “machine learning”.
Not volunteers who pulled the humanitarian under fire, spent the night at the borders, exported people from hell, searched for insulin throughout Europe, sinned with stew in warehouses, lost their cars and friends.
Their feat is under investigation. Because they did not sign the agreement. Or did not have time. Or they did not know what it existed.
Law No. 56677 clearly identifies: there are official and saints. And there are everyone else.
And now a little international sobriety
- Afghanistan: Amnesty everyone – both their own, and not very. Result? The taliba returned, the victims were in the graves. The state is in the shade.
- Iraq: Amnesty Law is Chaos. They returned to the game of those who should sit. Because they did not share who fired and who voted.
- Colombia: gave indulgence only for political. But even there was a tribunal. And though there is some attempt to understand.
- Pairs: TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION Commission. Not “excuse”, but public recognition, procedure, conditions. They thought at least somehow their head.
We have neither reports nor criteria, just: “There is a list – walk, brother.”
The state as a designer of “one’s own and not one’s” And here the question arises: who will make this beautiful list of selected enterprises? Who will sign under it, taking on all political, legal responsibility? And what happens to this person in a year when power or public mood changes? When will a new investigation, a new audit, a new mood? How long will her career last, if it turns out that someone from the list is not like a hero? Because we know how we love collective irresponsibility – until they look for the extreme. This person is also a separate law “draw” amnesty life?
Legal nihilism becomes particularly screaming when to remember: while some try to “bring out” by the selective law, others receive more serious articles in the Criminal Code-by “failure to comply with combat order”, “Humanitarian or charitable assistance”. And even if it was in chaos, risk and without instructions – circumstances are not interested in anyone. The law does not work as a system of justice, but as a selective hammer: one – immunity, others – suspicion.
With this law, the state actually says: if you are close to the body – we do not touch. If there, on the front, without official status, it is your personal initiative. And be responsible for it.
Instead of protecting everyone who pulled the country in the first months, they came up with how to protect only the chosen ones. Who has time, connections. Who is on the list.
What would be a healthy approach?
- A model where anyone who performed a combat or critical task is entitled to protection. Through an individual commission. By recognizing the action in the interests of defense.
- Not a “list”, but criteria: there was a risk, there was a goal, there was no criminal intent – therefore, protection.
- Transparency. Reporting. Explanation why these companies are.
But no. Because the war is all off. No, do not sleep. Because volunteers – remember. Because veterans – they see. Because the military is not blind. And if someone gets an indulgence today, someone will get suspicious tomorrow. And not the fact that it will be fair.
Bill No. 56677 is not about defense. It’s about the right not to answer. But only for the chosen ones.
The rest is a good day. And do not forget to collect documents for each socket from the frontline hospital. Because you are not amnesty.
Ruslana Velichkoonce changed the laws so ordinary people would not sit for real exploits
A column is a material that reflects the author’s point of view. The text of the column does not claim the objectivity and comprehensive coverage of the topic that rises in it. The editorial board of “Ukrainian Truth” is not responsible for the accuracy and interpretation of the information provided and plays only the role of the carrier. The point of view of the UP editorial board may not coincide with the point of view of the author of the column.