“The man robbed the epicenter for UAH 327, he committed an administrative offense again during the year the man was accused of theft of goods from the epicenter for a total amount of UAH 327. He committed an administrative offense during the year. This is stated in the resolution of the Svyatoshinsky District Court of Kyiv, published on September 26, 2025. 20.06.2025 A man in the Epicenter K store stole chicken fillets, […]”, – WRITE: Businessua.com.ua
The man robbed the epicenter for 327 UAH, he committed an administrative offense again during the year
A man accused of stealing goods from an epicenter on a common the amount of UAH 327. He committed an administrative offense during the year. This is stated in the resolution of the Svyatoshinsky District Court of Kyiv, published on September 26, 2025.
On January 20, 20125, a man in the Epicenter K store stole chicken fillets, vodka, beam, light beer, tomato. The total amount of stolen goods for UAH 327 without VAT. The offense is repeated during the year. With his actions, he committed an administrative offense under Part 3 of Art. 51 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, and caused material damage to 327 hryvnias without VAT. The offense is repeated during the year.
“The case file was attached: the Resolution of the Dniprovsky District Court of Kyiv of March 21, 2025, which entered into force on April 1, 2025, in case No. 755/3105/25 on bringing a man to administrative responsibility under part 1 In case №755/7880/25 about bringing a citizen to administrative responsibility under Part 1 of Art.
The court used all the possible means to call the man, but the latter did not appear in court, and given the terms of bringing a person to administrative responsibility, the court concluded that it was possible to resolve the issue of bringing him or her administrative responsibility in this court hearing.
What punishment did the court choose? The court found the man guilty of committing an administrative offense under Part 3 of Art. 51 KUPAP. He was imposed an administrative penalty in the form of a fine of three hundred non -taxable minimum incomes of citizens, which is 5 100 UAH.
“The court considers that a citizen should be subjected to an administrative penalty in the form of a fine of three hundred tax -free minimum incomes of citizens for committing the offense under Article 51 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
The gun
Please wait …