“The co-founder of “Concord” also noted that earlier Hetmantsev himself admitted that the case of “Concord” was “personal” for him.”, — write: www.unian.ua
The co-founder of “Concord” also noted that earlier Hetmantsev himself admitted that the case of “Concord” was “personal” for him.
Photo by UNIAN, Nadia PryshlyakChairman of the VRU Committee on Finance, Tax and Customs Policy, Danylo Hetmantsev, collected the signatures of 74 deputies on a petition to the Prosecutor General’s Office regarding the Concord bank, which is in the process of liquidation. With this, he diverted attention from his own alleged violations of the law to the co-owners of the bank. This was stated by the co-founder of the bank, Olena Sosyedka, on her Facebook page.“He collected the signatures of deputies to force the Prosecutor General’s Office to open a criminal case against us, the owners of Concorde. Thus, he is trying to divert attention from his own crimes and discredit those who spoke against him,” wrote Olena Sosedka.
She noted that Danylo Hetmantsev uses his position as a shield to cover up his own violations of the law.
“Apparently, Hetmantsev became aware that the Prosecutor General’s Office is considering our application due to his illegal actions regarding the Concord bank. This case is long overdue, because its violation is not just an attack on our bank, but a spit in the face of the entire Ukrainian legal system.” , – said Olena Sosyedka.
The co-founder of “Concord” also noted that earlier Hetmantsev himself admitted that the case of “Concord” was “personal” for him.
“A person who openly declares that Concord is his personal matter now wants to involve not only deputies, but also the Prosecutor General’s Office in his illegal activities. The body that should be the guarantor of the law is turning into a tool for settling accounts,” she stressed. she.
The bank’s shareholders call on people’s deputies to realize that supporting Hetmantsev in this case means complicity in his criminal activities. In addition, they appealed to the Prosecutor General’s Office to preserve its reputation and not follow Hetmantsev’s lead.
“We are not afraid of investigations, because we have nothing to hide,” said the co-owner of Concord. She added that the shareholders of “Concord” repeatedly offered an open dialogue regarding the situation with their bank, but were not heard.
“Danilo Oleksandrovych, we are not afraid of your intrigues. You can collect signatures, fabricate cases and manipulate the authorities, but you will not stop the truth. There is one law for everyone. And you will answer for it,” concluded Olena Sosedka.
We will remind that rthe National Bank deprived “Concord” of its license, accusing it of violations of the law. However, the Dnipropetrovsk District Administrative Court recognized this decision as illegal. At the same time, Ukrainian legislation does not provide for a mechanism for the return of a banking institution to the market even after winning the court.