“
Miroslav Trinko Geek, specialty programmer, but journalist by profession. Rider, tennis player and fan of Formula-1. I write about technologies, smartphones and electric vehicles.
The participants of the study were asked to invent the idea of a toy that includes a brick and a fan. Some used Chatgpt, others – their own thoughts, or combined personal ideas with the Internet. As it turned out, 94% of ideas created with Chatgpt repeated each other in contentwhereas those who have thought on their own or search, generated much more unique concepts.
Researchers used both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, and although the latter was a little more creative, He is still significantly inferior to a person in a variety of ideas. One example-nine participants who used Chatgpt, independently offered the same name for the toy: Build-a-Breeze Castle.
The study conducted by the Professors of the Warton School confirmed: the groups that relied on the AI were leaning to the same decisionswhile individual thinking provided a wider palette of options. According to Professor Tervish, it is about the “biological diversity” of ideas – necessary for a healthy creative ecosystem.
Although Chatgpt is not able to fully replace the human brainstorm, It can be a useful toolif you combine his proposals with his own ideas. Researchers advise you to use Chain of Thought Prompting – to ask AI to create several ideas and indicate that they are different.
”, – WRITE: mezha.media
Miroslav Trinko Geek, specialty programmer, but journalist by profession. Rider, tennis player and fan of Formula-1. I write about technologies, smartphones and electric vehicles.
The participants of the study were asked to invent the idea of a toy that includes a brick and a fan. Some used Chatgpt, others – their own thoughts, or combined personal ideas with the Internet. As it turned out, 94% of ideas created with Chatgpt repeated each other in contentwhereas those who have thought on their own or search, generated much more unique concepts.
Researchers used both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, and although the latter was a little more creative, He is still significantly inferior to a person in a variety of ideas. One example-nine participants who used Chatgpt, independently offered the same name for the toy: Build-a-Breeze Castle.
The study conducted by the Professors of the Warton School confirmed: the groups that relied on the AI were leaning to the same decisionswhile individual thinking provided a wider palette of options. According to Professor Tervish, it is about the “biological diversity” of ideas – necessary for a healthy creative ecosystem.
Although Chatgpt is not able to fully replace the human brainstorm, It can be a useful toolif you combine his proposals with his own ideas. Researchers advise you to use Chain of Thought Prompting – to ask AI to create several ideas and indicate that they are different.