That rare case when no additional assessment of the team’s performance in a separate confrontation is required from us — everything was posted on the official website and all social networks of Dynamo Kyiv a few hours after the defeat against Cypriot Omonia. The period of Oleksandr Shovkovskyi’s work at the head of the “white and blue” came to an end. Dimly. As, for the most part, the last few months of the club’s life have passed. Once upon a time, it was necessary to put an end to this story.

Football.ua evaluates the game of Dynamo Kyiv players in the match at the GSP stadium (on a 10-point scale).

Dynamo Kyiv Ruslan Nescheret — 5.0. The work of the goalkeeper of Dynamo in this game was, perhaps, not so much, so he made three saves out of five shots on target, missing twice, respectively. Nescheret could hardly do anything in goal-scoring situations, except to reach for a penalty kick, while more attention was drawn to his mistakes during the kicks at the end of the match.

Oleksandr Karavaev — 4.5. Dynamo’s right wing defender was supposed to be one of the few who would help the team with experience in a similar game. However, Karavaev did not even demonstrate his usual activity in the attack. Except at the start of the match, when his serve to Popov almost became a goal.

Denys Popov (4.0) — Aliu Tiare (5.0) — 4.5. This is the case when what seems to be the best pair of central defenders of Kyiv recently did not work properly. Popov was remembered at the start of the game for an almost successful connection to the attack, but the next time he was celebrated for falling on the lawn, which led to an injury. And then as a result of one fall, which led to a ridiculous penalty. In the second half, Denys did not come out in the end, while his legionnaire partner did not do anything memorable in general, and maybe this is not so bad in the context of this defeat.

Taras Myhavko — 4.5. Again, the defender was assigned to the left flank of the defense, and Mykhavko was winning a duel with the opponents there, but take the episode with the second goal, when Taras returned to the center of the defense, and again a positional error is noticeable. In addition, the transmissions in his performance were not as high-quality as usual.

Oleksandr Pikhalyonok — 7.0. In the last two matches in the Dynamo lineup, if one should be singled out, it is the central midfielder, who confidently leads the team’s game in attack under any circumstances. How the partners respond to this is another matter, but almost every time Pikhalyonka had the ball at his feet, we were preparing for some interesting decision.

Mykola Mykhaylenko — 5.0. Opponents attacked quickly and, mostly, through the flanks, so it was difficult for the defender to place himself anywhere in such a game. In the end, Mykhaylenko began to join the attack in order not to be out of work at all, but without much success.

Valery Rubchinsky — 4.5. He got playing time from the first minutes, but after an hour on the field and 35 touches of the ball, he was substituted and did not remember anything.

Vladyslav Kabaev — 4.5. If the Dynamo winger’s first and only shot in this game would have turned out to be effective, then who knows if the events unfolded later. However, this explosion of activity at the start of the match did not turn into anything later.

Nazar Voloshyn — 5.0. The player with the most shots on the opponent’s goal in this game as part of Dynamo, it turns out that. Voloshyn broke through twice and twice the attempts forced the goalkeeper of Omonia to react. But the very concept of the “false nine” game was rather an open gesture of Shovkovsky regarding the fact that he never had a full-fledged forward, so they put someone who is simply in better conditions.

Shola Ogundana — 4.5. In a surprising way and at the most inappropriate moments, the Dynamo winger appears shy in the final stage of attacks, although at the same time his movement in front cannot be called bad by any means. Shola had a moment in the first half — he decided to play empty for Voloshyn. Why? He himself probably does not know.

Vladyslav Dubinchak — 5.0. Forced substitution due to Popov’s injury, although the score on the scoreboard at halftime, most likely, should have provoked the appearance of a more attacking wing defender on the field. However, it is one thing to make a replacement, and another is how it will prove itself. Dubinchak didn’t complete a single successful pass to someone else’s free kick in the end — a kind of reinforcement.

Vitaly Buyalsky — 5.0. The main person responsible for creativity in Dynamo was given a rest from the first minutes, and was thrown into battle already when the scoreboard was 2:0 in favor of Omonia, and supposedly after Kolos, such a situation should have been familiar to Buyalskyi. However, no, the best moment with Vitaliy’s participation was an unsuccessful take-off shot in someone else’s penalty area.

Eduardo Guerrero — 5.0. Oddly enough, the complete forward of Dynamo found his moment in this game almost immediately after appearing on the field. But he never managed to outplay Uzoho, although he executed a header almost flawlessly.

Oleksandr Yatsyk, Matvii Ponomarenko — a couple of final substitutions in the game for +/- a quarter of an hour, when the team was almost without the ball again. At the same time, the attacker managed to make even one unsuccessful blow.

Do you want to be the first to know about the main football news? Subscribe to our Telegram channel! You can also follow our site on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.