“The Court of Appeal released Magamedrasulov from custody, obliging him to appear at the first request of the investigator, the prosecutor, the court”, — write: www.radiosvoboda.org
The appellate court partially satisfied the defense’s request – annulled the decision of the court of first instance, released Magamedrasulov from custody in the courtroom, obliging him to appear at the first request of the investigator, the prosecutor, and the court.
The day before, the court released the father of Ruslan Magamedrasulov Sentyabr from custody, placing him under a preventive measure in the form of night house arrest.
In October, the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv kept Magamedrasulov in custody until December 15. This decision was appealed.
Read also: OGP: the group of prosecutors in the case of Magomedrasulov consists of 42 people, “actually 5 prosecutors are working on the case”
In July, the SBU reported that it was investigating Russia’s alleged influence on the work of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau. Ruslan Magamedrasulov, head of one of the bureau’s interregional offices, was named among those involved.
According to the Security Service, a high-ranking NABU official and his father were informed of suspicion under the article “assistance to an aggressor state”. They were in custody. The SBU said that they suspect one of the heads of the interregional departments of NABU detectives that during the full-scale war, he and his father were engaged in organizing illegal trade with the Russian Federation.
Read also: The SBU announced new evidence in the case of a NABU official suspected of trading with the Russian Federation
Meanwhile, the Anti-Corruption Center called the NABU official’s accusations of trading with an aggressor country “PR machinations of the SBU”.
In July, “Ukrainian Pravda” published an article about the searches at NABU and quoted an anonymous interlocutor in the anti-corruption authorities, who he assumed was the reason for conducting investigative actions against the detectives: “In general, we think that they simply acted as a preventive measure, because we learned that suspicion was being prepared in NABU against Timur Mindich (co-owner of “Kvartal 95″ Studio)”, – the interlocutor assumed in anticororgans in the UP material.
NABU stated that on July 21, about 70 searches were carried out by employees of the SBU, the State Bureau of Investigation and the Prosecutor General’s Office against the bureau’s employees. The inspection also took place at the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office.