“ The National Anti-corruption Bureau reported that the department is not obliged to inform prosecutors about operational investigative measures in proceedings that do not concern the procedural management of the OGP. The bureau called the actions of the NABU employee who monitored the OGP legal. Source: NABU Verbatim: “In response to the information disseminated by the Office of the Prosecutor General regarding the search of an employee of the NABU, we report the following. The martial law regime does not establish prohibitions on documenting within the framework of the investigation of corruption crimes. In accordance with current legislation, employees of the NABU are not obliged to inform the prosecutors of the Office of the Prosecutor General about conducting or participating in operations of an operational-investigative or procedural nature, if it is not related to the procedural management of the Office’s prosecutors Prosecutor General in specific criminal proceedings”. Details: The agency emphasized that the NABU employee acted in strict accordance with the requirements of the law. NABU stressed the inadmissibility of interference in the bureau’s investigation by other bodies. We will remind: the National Anti-corruption Bureau stated that at night, special agents and prosecutors of the National Security Agency conducted a search of an employee of the NABU, using force. The Office of the Prosecutor General motivates the search of an employee of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau by the fact that he “organized the surveillance of the building of the OGP”. The Prosecutor General’s Office reported that it searched the home of a NABU employee because he was monitoring the OGP building. The department stated that the NABU employee explained this by the fact that he was “carrying out instructions from the management.” The OGP stated that the search was conducted “in view of the state of war, the specifics of the operation of the facility, which is subject to state protection, and the need for immediate response.””, — write: www.pravda.com.ua
Source: NABU
Literally: “In response to the information released by the Prosecutor General’s Office regarding the search of an NABU employee, we are reporting the following.
Advertising:
The martial law regime does not establish a ban on documenting within the framework of the investigation of corruption crimes.
In accordance with the current legislation, NABU employees are not obliged to inform the prosecutors of the Prosecutor General’s Office about conducting or participating in operations of an operational-investigative or procedural nature, if it is not related to the procedural management of the prosecutors of the Prosecutor General’s Office in a specific criminal proceeding.
Details: The agency emphasized that the NABU employee acted in strict accordance with the requirements of the law.
NABU stressed the inadmissibility of interference in the bureau’s investigation by other bodies.
We will remind:
- The National Anti-corruption Bureau said that at night, special agents and prosecutors of the National Security Service conducted a search of an employee of the NABU, using force.
- The Office of the Prosecutor General motivates the search of an employee of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau by the fact that he “organized the surveillance of the building of the OGP”.
- The Prosecutor General’s Office reported that it searched the home of a NABU employee because he was monitoring the OGP building. The department stated that the NABU employee explained this by the fact that he was “carrying out instructions from the management.” The OGP stated that searched”in view of the state of war, the specifics of the operation of the facility, which is subject to state protection, and the need for immediate response.”