“Foreign Minister Andriy Sibiga called on partners to respond to the UN statement to the UN’s statement that she is about to fight “as much as it would be needed.” Source: The Minister wrote about it, reports “European Truth” details: Sibiga drew attention to Nepenzi’s statements at a meeting of the UN Security Council, where he assured in the intention of his state “to continue and strengthen hostilities as much as it would be needed.””, – WRITE: www.pravda.com.ua
Source: The minister wrote about it on X, reports “European Truth”
Details: Sibiga drew attention to Nepenzi’s statements at a meeting of the UN Security Council, where he assured of his country’s intention to “continue and strengthen hostilities as much as it would be needed.”
Advertising:
“When the whole world insists that it is time to immediately stop murder and start meaningful diplomacy, Russia uses the highest diplomatic platforms to erect such militant rhetoric,” he said.
The head of Ukrainian diplomacy called Nepenzi “slap to all who advocate for peace” – not only Western powers, but also China, Brazil and others.
“We demand reactions to the bold statements of Russia, which threaten the peaceful process. We insist that the pressure on Moscow should be increased now. They do not understand the normal attitude or diplomatic language; time to speak with them the language of sanctions and strengthening support of Ukraine,” Sibiga emphasized.
Earlier on Friday, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky called the United States, European countries and all allies show more determination in the confrontation of Russian aggression after the next night blows of Russia, including Kharkiv.
Against the backdrop of recent statements of the Russian Federation and strengthening of air terror against Ukraine, US President Donald Trump stated that he is considering the possibility of introducing the introduction additional sanctions against.
But Trump recently announced that refrained from introduction sanctions against Russia, if it believes that it can “spoil” the conclusion “of the agreement” on peace.