““This time the New York Times and all other fake media enthusiastic complaints dissatisfied former employees as the only source for their article””, – WRITE: www.radiosvoboda.org
“This time, the New York Times – and all other fake media that repeat their sights – enthusiastically have complained of dissatisfied former employees as the only source for their article. They rely only on the words of people who have been released this week and seem to have a motive to sabotage the agenda of the Minister and the President, ”he wrote on the social network X.
Earlier, The New York Times reported that US Secretary of Defense Hegset shared detailed information about future strikes in Yemen on March 15 in a private chat group, which had his wife, brother and personal lawyer.
Unlike a chat that mistakenly included the editor of The Atlantic, the recently discovered chat was created by a hegset. He included his wife and about a dozen other people from his personal and professional environment in January, before his approval as the Minister of Defense, and was called “Defense | TEAM HUDDLE, ”said sources of the publication. To access the Signal Chat, he used his private phone, not government.
On March 24, the editor -in -chief of the American magazine The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg told how the team of President Donald Trump on national security included him in a secret chat, which discussed the strikes of Yemeni Hussites. According to him, the discussion took place in the Signal messenger, which allows you to exchange encrypted messages. The National Security Advisor Mike Voltz (it was he who sent the invitation to Goldberg), Vice president Jay Die Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Minister Pete Hegset and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard participated in the chat.
The chat was called Houthi PC Small Group. In it, according to Goldberg, a user named Pete Hegset published data on future Yena blows, including target information, the weapon that the US will deploy, and the sequence of attacks. ”
In the chat, the journalist appeared under the initials of JG. He suggests that he was added by mistaken instead of some other high -ranking White House official with the same initials.
Initially, Jeffrey Goldberg did not take the correspondence seriously, however, when the chat began to receive reports, Goldberg realized that “the conversation has a high level of plausibility.”