“
Vlad Cherevko I have been interested in all kinds of electronics and technologies since 2004. I like to play computer games, and I understand the work of different gadgets. I regularly monitor the news of the technology in the world and write materials about it.
Apple’s claim accuses his former employee, Cena Shi, who, as he seems to be conspiracy with OPPO, stole the Apple -related confidential data in Apple Watch. The lawsuit claims that the AIs handed over to the commercial secrecy to new employers after being released. More about this in our previous material.
Now it became known that OPPO responded to Apple’s claims and, as you can guess, rejected all the accusations. In a comment to Macrumors, the OPPO representative stressed that the company respects the commercial interests of other manufacturers, including Apple, and is not involved in the appropriation of its technologies.
“We know about the recent Apple claim in California, and carefully examined the accusations set out in Apple. We have not found any evidence that would confirm the connection between these accusations and the employee’s behavior while working at OPPO. Oppo is a companion. OPPO will actively cooperate with the legal process, and we are convinced that fair trial will clarify the facts, ” – said OPPO.
In turn, Apple has provided a large number of evidence that she said the guilt of the former employee and OPPO.
In particular, we are talking about reports in which the Vice President OPPO has informed about the health about collecting information and holding personal meetings in Apple for the purpose of collecting data. In response, the OPPO representative approvedly to the report that, according to Apple, shows the awareness of the company’s management about misconduct.
The lawsuit also mentions that Chen Shoi hid his intentions to go to the American department OPPO and instead said that “returned to China to take care of his aging parents.”
The trial is ongoing, and it is expected that more details about the circumstances of the case and the possible consequences for both companies will be published in the coming months.
”, – WRITE: mezha.media
Vlad Cherevko I have been interested in all kinds of electronics and technologies since 2004. I like to play computer games, and I understand the work of different gadgets. I regularly monitor the news of the technology in the world and write materials about it.
Apple’s claim accuses his former employee, Cena Shi, who, as he seems to be conspiracy with OPPO, stole the Apple -related confidential data in Apple Watch. The lawsuit claims that the AIs handed over to the commercial secrecy to new employers after being released. More about this in our previous material.
Now it became known that OPPO responded to Apple’s claims and, as you can guess, rejected all the accusations. In a comment to Macrumors, the OPPO representative stressed that the company respects the commercial interests of other manufacturers, including Apple, and is not involved in the appropriation of its technologies.
“We know about the recent Apple claim in California, and carefully examined the accusations set out in Apple. We have not found any evidence that would confirm the connection between these accusations and the employee’s behavior while working at OPPO. Oppo is a companion. OPPO will actively cooperate with the legal process, and we are convinced that fair trial will clarify the facts, ” – said OPPO.
In turn, Apple has provided a large number of evidence that she said the guilt of the former employee and OPPO.
In particular, we are talking about reports in which the Vice President OPPO has informed about the health about collecting information and holding personal meetings in Apple for the purpose of collecting data. In response, the OPPO representative approvedly to the report that, according to Apple, shows the awareness of the company’s management about misconduct.
The lawsuit also mentions that Chen Shoi hid his intentions to go to the American department OPPO and instead said that “returned to China to take care of his aging parents.”
The trial is ongoing, and it is expected that more details about the circumstances of the case and the possible consequences for both companies will be published in the coming months.