“ The Office of the Prosecutor General stated that in the case of probable bribe, anti -corruption authorities also conducted a prosecutor investigating the case of detectives of the National Anti -Corruption Bureau, which “raises doubts about the objectivity of the investigation and has signs of conflict of interest.” Source: The press service of the Prosecutor General’s Office Details: it is stated that on the basis of the VAKS decision of NABU detectives in the framework of pre -trial investigation in one of the criminal proceedings conducted searches in two prosecutors of the OGP. According to the court order, it is about events that took place in February-July this year. The decision states that one of the employees of the OGP, not in the framework of performing service or procedural duties, allegedly could be a mediator in the transfer of undue benefits in the amount of $ 3.5 million by judges of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court, they say in OGP. Another employee of the Attorney General’s office is mentioned in the same court order. Its role, actions and possible involvement in corruption offenses in the order is not specified, as well as the validity of the grounds for conducting the search. However, on the morning of October 9, a search was conducted at the place of residence and in the workplace, which ended in no avail – no things or documents of procedural importance were removed. At the same time, the OGP emphasizes that the said prosecutor is a group of prosecutors in the investigation of criminal proceedings, which investigates the facts of possible illegal activity of NABU detectives, in particular the head of one of the interregional departments of NABU detectives, Magamedrasulov, who is suspected. Literally: “According to a strange coincidence, it is in the midst of this investigation against the prosecutor that actions begin, which raises reasonable doubts about their objectivity. In this context, there is a risk of conflict of interest and the selective use of investigative mechanisms by NABU detectives and the prosecutors of the SAP. dedication to the principles of transparency, legality and legal certainty. by law. ” What preceded: Anti -Corruption Authorities on October 9 declared the prosecutor of the Attorney General and the lawyers to incite bribery, as if prosecutors of the Specialized Anti -Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and Judges of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court.”, – WRITE: www.pravda.com.ua
Source: Prosecutor General’s Office press service
Details: It is noted that on the basis of the VAKS decision, NABU detectives in the framework of the pre -trial investigation in one of the criminal proceedings conducted searches in two prosecutors of the OGP.
Advertising:
According to the court order, it is about events that took place in February-July this year. The decision states that one of the employees of the OGP, not in the framework of performing service or procedural duties, allegedly could be a mediator in the transfer of undue benefits in the amount of $ 3.5 million by judges of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court, they say in OGP.
Another employee of the Attorney General’s office is mentioned in the same court order. Its role, actions and possible involvement in corruption offenses in the order is not specified, as well as the validity of the grounds for conducting the search. However, on the morning of October 9, a search was conducted at the place of residence and in the workplace, which ended in no avail – no things or documents of procedural importance were removed.
At the same time, the OGP emphasizes that the said prosecutor is a group of prosecutors in the investigation of criminal proceedings, which investigates the facts of possible illegal activity of NABU detectives, in particular the head of one of the interregional departments of NABU detectives, Magamedrasulov, who is suspected.
Literally: “According to a strange coincidence, it is in the midst of this investigation against the prosecutor that actions begin, which raises reasonable doubts about their objectivity.
In this context, there is a risk of conflict of interest and selective use of investigative mechanisms by NABU detectives and SAP prosecutors. This leaves serious questions about the true motives for the investigation and impartiality of its participants.
The Office of the Prosecutor General emphasizes its dedication to the principles of transparency, legality and legal certainty. We do not support any form of pressure on the process of politicizing criminal prosecution or “witch hunting”, but we remain consistently interested in the objective establishment of truth.
For the proper response and adoption of informed management decisions, the UGP expects the official provision of criminal proceedings from NABU and SAP. This is necessary for internal verification in accordance with applicable law. ”
That preceded: On October 9, anti -corruption authorities announced the prosecutor of the Prosecutor General and the lawyers to incite bribery as if prosecutors of the Specialized Anti -Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and Judges of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court.