– In your opinion, only the financial component prompted Kozlovsky to sit down at the negotiating table on unification with the owner of “Karpat” Volodymyr Matkivskyi?
– There is no doubt that Kozlovsky was somewhat disappointed with the performance of “Rukh” in the current championship. Therefore, it was not out of nowhere that there were talks about changes at the helm of the team. Although I believe that “Rukh” is an original team that cannot be confused with anyone in Ukraine. Perhaps “Rukh” really slowed down somewhere, but let’s not forget the young age of the football players who formed the basis of the youth national team of Ukraine.
Secondly, it is possible that Kozlovsky expected that this football project would bring more profit from the sale of players. This did not happen. “Rukh” has not reached the European Cups, and otherwise it is not worth counting on any significant profit. In the end, I don’t think that this union will bring any profits to Kozlovsky, rather that he went to this deal to insure himself against even bigger losses.
Previously, the names of those who will change “Rukh” to “Karpaty” were named.
Source: sport.ua