The reason for this was the duty, which was formed in the Dnieper before the Miners for the transition of Alexander Pihalonko’s havbeck to Dynamo, which took place last summer.
Shakhtar stated in the court that the transition of the Pihllonka between Dnipro-1 and Dynamo a contract was drawn 2025.
Subsequently, “Dnipro-1” gave way to transfer compensation for the pendant to another legal entity, which received several payments from Dynamo 68 054 425 hryvnias, of which 20% under the previous agreement between “Dnipro-1” and “miner” should be transferred to the Miners.
However, Dnipro-1 asked the court to refuse to open bankruptcy proceedings, given the lack of payment of a payment in favor of Shakhtar 20% of any compensation for the Pihlunka, since the Dniprovsky club did not actually receive it, having previously reached the right. In addition, Dnipro-1 reported that he did not deny the circumstances with which Shakhtar appealed to the court on the transfer of the transfer of part of the compensation for the pendant, and also notes that such cases should be considered in the ward to resolve the UAF disputes, and then in the Sports Arbitration Court.
In the end, the court of first instance was on the side of Dnipro-1 and refused Shakhtar in the initiation of bankruptcy case of the Dnieper Club.
The decision of Judge Martyniuk states that Shakhtar may appeal it in the court of appeal in the prescribed manner.
Source: Sport.ua