“Specialist is satisfied with the actions of his wards”, – WRITE: Sport.ua
– It seemed from the side that the game is difficult, but the best in performing your team this season? Agree?
– Playing the best in the season? But no, it is definitely not the best. It was not bad for removal. I really liked how we avoided pressing 1 in 1. Next was a very bold game for ten against a good opponent. And it pleases the most – that we are aimed at construct.
– Due to the courage and dedication, you have achieved results. Even though the team scored from the penalty, it ran forward, and it seemed to be the Carpathians playing in the majority, not a rival.
– I am pleased that you celebrate it, because lately I hear a lot of negativity and do not understand what our football is cultivated at all. It seems to me that we have already deepened in defense in our championship that to continue to somehow poke the team for trying to attack, or a coach for what he says he wants to attack is not very good, it seems to me.
And what you say – that’s it, it seems to me, the value of great today is that you say that we played ten times, but we ran, continued to press, how much we succeeded, and created moments. And we won this not because of some chance of a penalty, but because we spent a lot of time there. This is important.
And it seems to me that you just said that you have said more on the air – that when someone is trying to play an attacking football when someone is trying to play boldly, it is necessary to cultivate it in the lower leagues, in youth football, they took an example of it. Not to defend and run out purely on counterattacks, as the majority of our football do, but trying to play 1 number.
-Removal in the 1st half. Was foul or not? Because you reacted very emotionally.
– The foul was, 100 percent. No, look. Pablo was the first on the ball, he kept the ball. He struck the jaw of the LNZ player, the LNZ player was in dynamics, he ran the same, and they collided. The touch of the face was 100 percent, but it seems to me that you need to move away a little from understanding such a clear moment.
That is, you need to understand that you break the game. The game was really very interesting, in the first minutes there were many transitions from the side of LNZ, dangerous transitions, we had positional attacks good, many approaches to the gate.
The game began to open, and we changed it a little. I cannot say that there was no reason to give that second card. But if you come from what was happening on the field, as they say very often, the “spirit of the game” may have to think, it seems to me.
-In the 2nd half, it seemed for a moment that Brunino grabbed the back surface of the thigh. Did he dragged if there were any other damage to the team from the fact that they were given a lot of intensity on the field?
– In the break, we said that we have no player, and that does not say that we would go to defense, also says that we all need this distance, which was running, to distribute from all.
Did you follow Bruno during the match?
– It was noticeable.
– It’s good, bright players always pay attention. The load is very serious, we played the previous game very intensively, and the imprint that we train on synthetics, and in the first minutes, again, many losses of the ball because it is very inhibitory, there is no watering yet, so it is difficult to rebuild from the synthetic field to live.
