– Let’s once again not consider the contract with the termination of the contract when the story of its social networks broke out?
– This option could not be considered because it is impossible from a legal point of view. But if there were facts of supporting the player of the aggressor country or any anti-Ukrainian views, I would be convinced that we would find enough arguments to terminate the contract for good reason. But this is not.
In the situation with the bleach, as in any transfer, in the negotiation process, we discuss their position with the players. Conditionally, the attitude towards Russia’s aggression is one of the issues that is discussed in the course of communication. If we understood that there were at least hints at the support of this country or against Ukraine, no such transfer would have happened. Accordingly, in this particular situation, everything was standard.
This issue cannot be discussed because a person goes to the country that is fighting. That is, he must understand what he will have to deal with. We cannot invite the player to live in some illusions, and here he arrived and get. Therefore, it is clear that during the negotiations all this is discussed. The breeding service checked its background.
May not reach Tiktok. In the future we will look tiktok too. More attention had to be paid to this. This is a good experience that something happens there too. Because you look at his Instagram and Facebook are the main platforms from which people are communicating. I am convinced that his repost does not testify to some pro -Russian support. And we spoke with him.
But, in conclusion, another proof that all players should understand the importance of information hygiene. The club made its conclusions from it. Vladislav also did them, which he told in detail in his interview.
Earlier, Alexander caravizes commented on the defeat of Crystal Pelas.
Source: Sport.ua