Shakhtar Donetsk did not have global tasks in the second match against Finnish Ilves, after the defeat of opponents in the first game with a score of 6: 0. And what kind of motivation for the football players was the fan, if not every iron came to the idea that the match-answer should eventually become almost important than a friendly game against a trilaw the next day? The Pitmen exposed almost completely “reserve” composition, but in the end they still looked on their heads above the level of skill than the rivals, except for one moment – it was not possible to score. And the rest of the events took place in the same scenario as a week ago.

Football.ua evaluates the game of players of Donetsk Shakhtar in a match at Tammel Stadium (on a 10-point scale).

Shakhtar Donetsk

Dmitry Raznik – 6.5. If in the first game on the goalkeeper of Shakhtar managed to break through at least at the end of the game time, this time the difference touched the ball except for his feet. In the worst case, he is under the pressing from the opponents.

Vinisius Tobias – 5.5. Probably, the right defender of the Miners can be confidently recorded in the list of the main losers of the Turan team this evening, because its confrontation against Uzlund on the flank in the defense is definitely impossible to call successful. With the exception of one serving on Aeginald in the second half, which should end the goal if the partner did not bend his head with his head.

Alaa Gram – Valery Bondar – 6.5. The Shakhtar Defense Center also had no noticeable problems in confrontations from the rivals, which may prove the lack of direct danger to the gate of the difference.

Irakli Azarov – 6.0. The Georgian flank defender of the Donetsk people can accurately have more sharp matches in terms of attacks than we saw in his performance this time, but even Azarov remained noticeable throughout the game. Let it be less than his Brazilian competitor a week ago.

Artem Bondarenko – 6.5. Shakhtar’s central midfielder this time was more attached to the attack than in the first game, because there was no Sudakov on the field from the first minutes, and therefore the ball in Bondarenko was banal. However, it did not work out the effective action, although the moment was available in the second half.

Oleg Ocheretko – 6.0. The player was actually forced to play the lowest among the three in the center of the field, so we never saw the usual attack football from the Ocheretko. But even in the actions of destruction of opponents attacks, he had no particular problems.

Pedrignyo da Silva – 7.0. Probably the largest number of goal opportunities and in general the most noticeable player of the Miners ahead of this evening was this Brazilian. As he failed to score, this is another question, because at least in the first half the moments were such that remained only successfully put the leg.

Eginaldo – 6.5. The position on the edge of the attack by the Brazilian did not receive this evening, but on the left flank in 55 minutes a lot of times fled from the opponents and simply had to become the author of assistant on Pedrignyo in the first and traore in the second half respectively, but the partners decided to break in the decisive moments.

Lassina Trarea – 6.5. The Burkin’s striker of the Donetsk in general has done everything he had to ask for Turan in this game, except for one – he did not score a goal in his moment. Although before that in a friendly game, Brinie Trarea had three similar broadcasts, as Eginaldo did in him in the second half, and all three realized.

Neverton – 7.0. The miniature Brazilian began the game on the right flank of the attack, and after replacing Aeginald moved to the opposite side of the field. At the same time, two very sharp moments with his participation ended with blows into the gate frame. There was not a little enough for the goal ball, like the whole miner.

Marian Swede – 6.0. In the second game, the Ukrainian striker still got the opportunity to show himself in the European Cups, but did not use it too well. Only one moment with the participation of Swedes – a potential goal pass on a non -arid in a push in the center of another’s penalty area, but his partner did not use it.

Gorge Hochleishvili – 6.0. The Georgian right defender came out to push the rivals with its speed breakthroughs, and this task, as well as the team as a whole, did not cope. But the speech in the context of defense had exactly better, or at least more calm than Vinisius to him.

Georgy Sudakov – 6.0. Like most players, Sudakov received a holiday in this game from the first minutes, but eventually appeared on the field and generally repeated the tendency of the first game with his participation. Not too good performance, though one potentially goal pass and one momentary moment from it in 25 game minutes we saw.

Kauan Elias – 6.0. This time, Shakhtar attacker did not receive a goal for replacement, but he created it for a partner, Pedrignyo, but he did not use it.

Yegor Nazarina – Shakhtar’s permanent shabby is only at the end of the match under conditions when it is not so much time to manifest itself, and in the end does not have time to be distinguished by some noticeable actions.

Do you want to learn about the main football news first? Subscribe to our Channel in Telegram! You can also follow our site on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.