“The prosecutor’s office was unable to return the branch “Rokytne Forestry of the State Specialized Business Enterprise” Forests of Ukraine “of the land plot of 0.5 hectares, which is in use of FOP Vasyl Petrovsky.”, – WRITE: epravda.com.ua
The prosecutor’s office was unable to return the branch “Rokytne Forestry of the State Specialized Business Enterprise” Forests of Ukraine “of the land plot of 0.5 hectares, which is in use of FOP Vasyl Petrovsky. This is evidenced by the decision of the Commercial Court of Kyiv from January 19. In 2015, the head of the Rivne Regional State Administration allocated Vasyl Petrovsky to long-term temporary use of the plot in the territory of the state-owned enterprise “Rokytne forestry” Mashevitsky forestry of 0.5 hectares for use for cultural, health and recreational purposes for 15 years. According to the contract, the entrepreneur on the site had the right to erect temporary buildings, structures, fences and other linear -type structures necessary for conducting business activities; Receiving income from recreational services. Advertising: according to the prosecutor’s office, since 2015, the land plot has not been used for these purposes and funds for its use of the State Enterprise “Rokytne Forestry” did not receive. Therefore, law enforcement officers believe that the contract concluded between the Regional State Administration and the FOP should be terminated and the site is returned to the Forests of Ukraine. At the same time, as the court established, “Rokytne forestry” of the state specialized economic enterprise “Forests of Ukraine” participates in the case as a third party, and does not declare independent requirements for the subject of the dispute on the plaintiff’s side. And how many party of the disputed contract is not involved in the case as the plaintiff or defendant, the claim of the prosecutor’s office cannot be satisfied with the court. In court, the prosecutor’s office was represented by OA Bykhovtsova, Judge – Vashchenko TM Adklama: Recall that the DBR reported suspicion to the executive director of the State Enterprise “Forests of Ukraine” and two directors of departments of the same enterprise, which purchased mobile phones at inflated prices.