November 13, 2025
The pension fund requires the husband to pay 16,118 hryvnias of illegally received benefits due to non-payment of alimony - a court decision. thumbnail
Business

The pension fund requires the husband to pay 16,118 hryvnias of illegally received benefits due to non-payment of alimony – a court decision.

The person must reimburse the PFU for housing assistance received in the amount of 16,118 hryvnias, as he did not inform about the conditions affecting the payment of the subsidy. The person was registered in the Pension Fund database and received housing benefits. However, it later became known that the family includes persons who, according to the data of the Unified Register of Debtors, have debts due to enforcement proceedings for recovery […]”, — write: businessua.com.ua

Court

The person must reimburse the PFU for housing assistance received in the amount of 16,118 hryvnias, as he did not inform about the conditions affecting the payment of the subsidy

The person was listed in base of the Pension Fund and received a housing benefit. However, later it became known that the family includes persons who, according to the data of the Unified Register of Debtors, owe more than three months of alimony due to enforcement proceedings. In this regard, the PFU demands the return of the received benefit in the amount of 16,118 hryvnias. This is stated in the decision of the Pervomaisky City District Court of the Mykolaiv Region, published on November 11, 2025.

The citizen was registered with the State University of PFU in the Mykolaiv Region and received a housing subsidy from August 1, 2023 in accordance with Regulation No. 848 based on the application dated August 7, 2023 and the declaration of income and expenses dated August 7, 2023. So, from 01.08.2023 to 31.12.2023, he was granted a housing subsidy in the amount of 7,297 hryvnias and 8,821 hryvnias for the period from 01.11.2023 to 30.11.2023 for additional assistance, which is confirmed by the decision on the allocation of the subsidy dated 31.08.2023. The total amount is 16,118 hryvnias. On April 9, 2024, an audit was conducted of the truthfulness and completeness of the household’s income information (property status). As a result of the verification carried out by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, information was received that the family includes persons who, according to the data of the Unified Register of Debtors, owe more than three months of alimony enforcement proceedings (number of enforcement proceedings: 67712240, date of initiation of enforcement proceedings: 02.12.2021, status of the proceedings: open, authority that issued the document: Pervomaysky City District Court of Mykolayiv Oblast). In a letter dated August 23, 2024, the husband was informed of the need to return to the bank account of the PFU State University in Mykolaiv Oblast the overpaid housing subsidy for the period from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 and 8,821 hryvnias for the period from November 1, 2023 to November 30, 2023 for additional support, the total amount is 16,118 hryvnias. He voluntarily did not return the overpayment in the total amount of 16,118 hryvnias.

What decision did the court make? The court supported the lawsuit of the Main Department of the Pension Fund of Ukraine in the Mykolaiv region. The overpaid housing subsidy for the period from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in the amount of UAH 7,297 and additional assistance in the amount of UAH 8,821 for the period from November 1, 2023 to November 30, 2023 will be collected from the husband in favor of the PFU, which is a total of UAH 16,118.

“The court found out that the defendant was informed of his obligation to inform the plaintiff about the circumstances affecting the provision of a housing subsidy, however, the case file does not contain confirmation that the defendant in the prescribed manner notified the Main Directorate of the presence in the household of persons who, according to the Unified Register of Debtors, owe more than three months in debt due to enforcement proceedings for the collection of alimony. Taking into account the above, evaluating all aspects of the case in their totality, as well as, based on the recognition of the claim by the defendant, the court comes to the conclusion that there are grounds for making a decision on the satisfaction of the claim,” the court emphasized.

The source

No votes yet.

Please wait…

Related posts

Stellar Tumbles Below Key $0.285 Support as Bears Take Over

unian ua

Asia Morning Briefing: Hong Kong’s FinTech Week Belongs to Stablecoins, Not CBDCs

unian ua

Taxi prices in Ukraine will rise sharply not only due to the cost of fuel – prediction.

unian ua

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More