February 11, 2026
NABU Chairman Kryvonos emphasized that the return of corruption money to the state budget is not the Bureau's main task. thumbnail
Business

NABU Chairman Kryvonos emphasized that the return of corruption money to the state budget is not the Bureau’s main task.

NABU head Semyon Krivonos claims that the effectiveness of his department is not determined by the money returned to the budget. He said this during a briefing, answering the question why Ukraine spends much more money on the maintenance of NABU than it returns to the state through its activities, UNIAN reports. VIDEO OF THE DAY According to him, there is a side financial impact from the activities of NABU, but the return of corrupt sums to the budget by this anti-corruption body […]”, — write: businessua.com.ua

NABU head Semyon Krivonos claims that the effectiveness of his department is not determined by the money returned to the budget. He said this during the briefing, answering to the question of why Ukraine spends much more money on the maintenance of NABU than it returns to the state through its activities, UNIAN reports.

VIDEO OF THE DAY

According to him, there is a side financial impact from the activities of NABU, but the return of corruption funds to the budget is not considered by this anti-corruption body as its task.

“How to evaluate the financial result of NABU’s actions? Returning money to the state budget is not our main task,” Kryvonos said.

In response to the clarification that NABU was created specifically to fight corruption and embezzlement of taxpayers’ funds, its head noted: “there is a corruption component in the SBI as well, and their funding is greater than ours.”

ADVERTISING

In the view of the director of NABU, the assessment of the work of the Bureau should not be approached with economic criteria, since the receipt of money to the budget is not the function of the Bureau.

“I want to find out in this context, whether the main goal of NABU is to confirm its economic justification? Does this mean that in a year it is necessary to return as much money as was spent on its operation, on wages for detectives, on fuel for cars, cartridges…” he asked.

The director of NABU is sure that the financial allegations that NABU “does not earn enough” are manipulations by opponents of the anti-corruption bureau: “But this is what our opponents often abuse: look, they spent 2.6 billion hryvnias on them, and they returned 600 million. That is, everything is measured through the financial result?”.

ADVERTISING

As previously reported, NABU will receive UAH 2.6 billion of budget funds per year from January, while last year it returned only UAH 680 million to the budget. Without the Bureau, the Ukrainian budget would have an additional almost UAH 2 billion every year. In general, during the 10 years of its existence NABU used more than UAH 10.6 billion of taxes of Ukrainian citizens.

Source

No votes yet.

Please wait…

Related posts

Tokenization is still at the beginning of the hype cycle, but needs more use cases, experts say

unian ua

Europe will seek concessions from Putin to end the war.

unian ua

Nike Falls After Earnings Beat as North America Strength Fails to Offset China

unian ua

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More