“The citizen committed a minor hooliganism, namely, he damaged three windows in the premises of “Ukrposhta”, thereby committing a misdemeanor, provided for in Art. 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The man is charged with petty hooliganism. He broke three windows in the Ukrposhta building. This is reported in the decision of the Karliv District Court of the Poltava Region, published on November 5, 2025. On September 20, 2025, a man committed minor hooliganism, […]”, — write: businessua.com.ua
The citizen committed a minor hooliganism, namely, he damaged three windows in the premises of “Ukrposhta”, thereby committing a misdemeanor, provided for in Art. 173 of the Labor Code of Ukraine
To a man incriminating the commission of petty hooliganism. He broke three windows in the Ukrposhta building. This is reported in the decision of the Karliv District Court of the Poltava Region, published on November 5, 2025.
On September 20, 2025, the man committed minor hooliganism, namely, he smashed three windows in the Ukrposhta facility, thereby committing the offense specified in Art. 173 of the Labor Code of Ukraine. During the court session, he admitted his guilt and sincerely repented.
What penalty did the court choose? The court found the citizen guilty of committing an administrative offense provided for in Art. 173 of the Labor Code of Ukraine. An administrative penalty of 40 hours of community service was imposed on him.
“After studying the materials of the case, the court comes to a conclusion. Article 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides for liability for minor hooliganism, i.e. obscene language in public places, intrusive harassment of citizens and other similar acts that violate public order and peace of the population. The man’s guilt in committing a misdemeanor, provided for in Article 173 of the Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure, is confirmed by the protocol on an administrative violation from 20.09.2025, by the written testimony of the offender and the witness. After analyzing the evidence, the court considers that he has committed petty hooliganism, namely, a misdemeanor provided for in Article 173 of the Code of Administrative Offenses misdemeanor, the degree of his guilt, the circumstances that mitigate and aggravating responsibility. In view of the above, taking into account the nature of the offense committed, I consider it necessary to impose on him the sanction of Article 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which corresponds to the type and scope of Article 23 The Criminal Procedure Code, the purpose of imposing an administrative penalty, is necessary and sufficient for the correction of a person who has committed an administrative offense, as well as the prevention of the commission of offenses,” the court emphasized.
The source
Please wait…