Corruption in WAKS – which stands on the statement of DBR

The lawyer Rostislav Kravets stated the need to dissolve the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court of Ukraine, because, according to him, this institution “turned into a mechanism for solving the necessary decisions” through shadow agreements. He stated this, commenting on the loud detention

On May 30, 2025, the State Bureau of Investigation detained the former official after leaving the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv. He was released from under custody, Instead, they chose a preventive measure in the form of a personal obligation.

As reported in the DBR, it refers to Yemelyanov’s probable agreement with a judge of the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court and with the Judge of the Pechersk Court to make a decision in his favor. In response to these statements, the WACs made a comment on “attempting to pressure and discredit the court”, as well as the “inadmissibility of unjustified public statements”.

According to the Judicial Reporter, Criminal Proceedings against Arthur Yemelyanov are related to suspicion of creating a criminal organization and receiving an undue benefit in the form of corporate rights. Since December 2024, court sessions were held both in the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv and in the High Anti -Corruption Court, which considered the issue of a preventive measure.

Earlier, Wax reported on the detection of technical means of housing in one of the judges – Vladimir Dubas. Separately, the refusal of this judge was involved in the further consideration of the precautionary event of Yemelyanov.

According to the lawyer Rostislav Kravts, the DBR reports about the possible participation of several officials – judges, prosecutor, investigator and probably lawyers – in assisting a favorable decision. There is no official confirmation of these statements at this time, the parties to the comments are mainly held.

Reference

In 2012, Arthur Yemelyanov and Judge of the Economic Court Anatoliy Ivchenko were involved in the case of debt collection in favor of the Russian Federation on the liabilities of the EEC. During the year, 38.6 million hryvnias were drawn in favor of Russia. Ivchenko was reported suspected of treason, but the High Council of Justice did not consent to his detention. Yemelyanov was taken under the worth in May 2025. Yemelyanov’s defense denies all the charges, claiming the deadline for liability and similar decisions in other jurisdictions.

Earlier, the Telegraph wrote that the level of distrust of Ukrainians with NABU, SAP and Wax reached a critical mark – these anti -corruption structures are perceived by society almost as distrusting as pro -Russian politicians. This conclusion follows from the results of a sociological study conducted by the Razumkov Center.

Source: kp.ua