“A few kilograms of paper evidence were brought by lawyer Igor Sinichenko at the next meeting in the Wax on the case of former President Viktor Yanukovych and his son Alexander. Last week, a new stage began in the case – after the prosecution side, the evidence in favor of Yanukovych is now provided by the defense party. What do lawyers say? The court hearing today, August 5, began with a delay, so a lawyer”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
A few kilograms of paper evidence were brought by lawyer Igor Sinichenko at the next meeting in the Wax on the case of former President Viktor Yanukovych and his son Alexander.
Last week, a new stage began in the case – after the prosecution side, the evidence in favor of Yanukovych is now provided by the defense party.
What do lawyers say?
The court hearing today, August 5, began with a delay, so lawyer Igor Sinichenko had enough time to prepare a mountain of evidence – documents that, according to the lawyer, should convince the court that Viktor Yanukovych It belonged Only small part of the estate In Novy Petrivtsi (“Mezhigorye”), instead the main owner of real estate was Tantalit LLC.
“We try to reach the judges so that they are fully, objectively and comprehensively examined the materials provided. Protection tries to prove that all prosecutors in the indictment are not true. However, any forecasts for a judicial decision to make it very early, ” – said the representative of the defense party Igor Sinichenko in a comment for ua.news.
Yanukovych and Mezhigoryr’s Case: What is known
We will remind, in the Supreme Anti -Corruption Court there is a consideration of appeal in the criminal proceedings of Yanukovych. According to the prosecution, in 2002-2013 former President Viktor Fedorovich together with his son Alexander, abusing his office, illegally took possession land plot on the territory of Vyshgorod district and a complex of structures located on this site, namely the recreation complex “Pushcha-Vodoitsa” of the tract “Mezhigorye” and a house in the village. New Petrivtsi. Losses, caused to the state exceed UAH 540 million.
The actions of the former President are qualified for signs of crime provided for in Part 5 of Art. 191, Part 3 of Art. 209, Part 5 of Art. 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, his son – under Part 5 of Art. 191, Part 3 of Art. 209 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
As during the time the past meeting In spite of the prosecutor’s objection (the prosecution party), the evidence was attached to the case file. The next meeting will be held on September 11. Let’s follow with UA.news journalists .
