There are much more than three. How to Prevent Attacks on the Representatives of the Shopping Center during the War – Hrabsky

Military expert Sergey Grabsky shared his considerations on this situation and how to prevent such cases in the future.

These are just the last facts that have led to the surface. I have been tracking this situation for a long time. How many only arson attempts were there? Last year, if I’m not mistaken, there are 350 cases.

And this trend is constant. And it is reinforced and fueled by the enemy’s actions.

See how many agents we capture and condemn. These are just quite serious cases.

Therefore, it is a complex struggle, but you know, it cannot be transmitted only in one hand that “it is a matter of the SBU or the National Police, let them do.” This is our common common business.

I have always been a supporter that people who have passed the army, that people who know how to own a weapon should have weapons at their own disposal. I understand that they can speak against it, but I am convinced that weapons should be in everyone to prevent such manifestations.

Because, you know, when you have literally a few minutes or seconds to a reaction, you can only do one thing – either to run or protect yourself. Or hide as one of the views.

[Чи небуде ще гірше?] Won’t.

In Moldova, this rule has been working for a long time. There, all people have the right to wear short -barreled weapons, of course, registered. This turned Moldova into a wild event? No. But there is an realization that you have to be extremely polite, realizing that not only you can have a weapon.

I always draw an analogy. We are in the situation of the great Israel. And you know perfectly well that in Israel everyone wears weapons. Even a soldier or a soldier, or everyone who goes on release can carry a machine gun. We are in this situation. Sometimes an instant response can prevent serious crimes. There are no other options, dear friends.

In the context of the Belarusian events, I said that no poodle was released against the wolves. Wolfs produce wolves against the wolves. Therefore, the issue of weapons remains relevant to us.

Second. Any attack on a person in the form – which has a military form, signs of distinguishing, corresponding marks that it is a person who belongs to the power unit – must be considered as hostilities, and the enemy must be destroyed in place.

In the Old Statute of the Armed Forces for the internal service I was still studying, Article 23 provided for wearing personnel of traumatic weapons. Now, for some reason, this article has disappeared. 23 Article of the Statute of the Internal Service sounds a little different. And it surprised me very much, honestly.

Therefore, the first thing is that the right to protect a person with weapons should be increased. The right to wear a registered weapon and its use should be saved if necessary.

By the way, it is provided by the current legislation. If you are attacked by a group of people without weapons, you have the right to use your own weapon, to fire them all, and it will be absolutely legal. Or if you are attacked by a person with a weapon.

We are in a state of war. As we found out at the beginning of our conversation, we do not have a specific front line, where it is right, which is wrong. The war goes everywhere: in the air, on earth, in the information space, on our streets, in our fields, cities and villages.

There is no front line, so we have to understand: either you protect this state or you with its enemy of that state. There is no other option today.