“The former topless of Privatbank, including the shareholders of Monobank Gorokhovsky and Yatsenko, is involved in the issuance of illegal loans of $ 1.8 billion. From the court’s decision it follows that the former top management of Privatbank, including the current shareholders of monobank Oleg Gorokhovsky and Dmitry Yatsenko, systematically issued insider loans to Cyprus”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Former PrivatBank Tops Management, including the shareholders of Monobank Gorokhovsky and Yatsenko, is involved in the issuance of illegal loans of $ 1.8 billion.
A journalist writes about it Svetlana Kryukov With reference to the British decision Royal court.
From the court’s decision follows that toOlish -Toe Managing PrivatBank, including the current shareholders of Monobank Oleg Gorokhovsky and Dmitry Yatsenko, systematically issued insider loans to Cypriot companies that belonged to the beneficiaries of the bank, which led to the withdrawal Prevent such actions, but in fact she was their accomplice. Most of the persons involved in this scheme, including Yatsenko, are outside Ukraine and have been wanted by NABU, but Oleg Gorokhovsky still remains at large.
Details of charges and court decisions
The Royal Court actually stated that the shareholders’ group who controlled 10% of PrivatBank’s capital coordinated actions and followed the instructions of the main beneficiaries. They issued insider loans, knowing in advance that these funds would not be returned.
The most outrageous in this case is the role of Gorokhovsky and Yatsenko, who headed the Ethics and Compliance Commission. This body was to be independent and protect the bank from problematic loans. However, as stated in the court decision, they not only did not fulfill their function, but also became signatories and accomplices of issuance of 129 problematic credit agreements.
Questions to the Ukrainian authorities and law enforcement agencies
Most of the accomplices of the scheme, from the doubles to Yatsenko, are wanted by NABU. However, Oleg Gorokhovsky, who manages the monobank and which deposits of millions of Ukrainians depend on, remains at large. As Kryukov writes, tHey fact raises a number of questions to the Ukrainian authorities:
-
To NABU: Why did Gorokhovsky have not yet been detained, despite his role in the scheme of withdrawal of funds, confirmed by the decision of the royal court?
-
To the Presidential Office: Why did Gorokhovsky represent the interests of Ukrainian business at a recent meeting with Zelensky and Yermak?
-
To the sanctions committees: Why is Gorokhovsky not under sanctions, as those beneficiaries of PrivatBank, from which he received instructions and made a decision to issue misconduct?
According to the journalist, tI demonstrate dual standards in approaches to former Privatbank toplers and calls into question the effectiveness of Ukrainian law enforcement and anti -corruption bodies.
Meanwhile NABU and SAP have completed the investigation Cases of the former ultimate beneficial owner of PJSC CB “Privatbank” and five members of the organized group in the seizure of the bank in the amount of more than UAH 9.2 billion.
Gennady Bogolyubov’s lawyer Alexei Nizhnik Disproved widespread Materials that claim that Bogolyubov lost $ 1 billion in PrivatBank’s assets or that assets were blocked in the Virgin Islands.
