“Fifth President Petro Poroshenko accused the new Prime Minister Yulia Sviridenko, who declared the validity of sanctions against him. Poroshenko stated this at a session of the Supreme Court, which considers his claim on the decree on sanctions, the press service of the European Soloiality writes. It is indicated that during the meeting of the Verkhovna Rada Yulia Sviridenko, who was appointed to the Prime Minister of Ukraine, stated that she said that”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Fifth President Petro Poroshenko accused the new Prime Minister Yulia Sviridenko, who declared the validity of sanctions against him.
Poroshenko stated this at a session of the Supreme Court, which is considered a claim on the decree on sanctions writes Press service Europe.
It is indicated that during the meeting of the Verkhovna Rada Yulia Sviridenko, who was appointed to the Prime Minister of Ukraine, stated that sanctions Against Poroshenko They were introduced on the basis of the decision of the interagency working group and the data of SCFM. Instead, the chairman of the State Financing Philip Pronin at a meeting of the parliamentary TSK on June 25 stated that he did not transmit the Ministry of Economy of Poroshenko, as it violates the law.
“It is evidence of falsification, illegality of sanctions. This is a cardinal contradiction when Pronin says: “I did not send anything”and Sviridenko says: “Everything was directed by Pronin”. I want to say that today in 2025, neither the Ministry of Economy, or even more so, without legitimate powers, financial monitoring, nor the Cabinet of Ministers did not initiate sanctions. In addition to the decree stating my last name. Because the Security Service of Ukraine has been initiated all times. But in the submission of the Security Service of Ukraine there is no name Poroshenko, ” – said politician.
“Shmigal, who signed sanctions and was 100% of the presidential person, resigned. In his place is assigned a thousand percent “your own” Sviridenko. There are calculations for illegal sanctions against Poroshenko. Moreover, the embassy chairs have already ended, they went to a large currency in the form of a prime minister’s chair. Calculated for violation of the law and my legal rights, ” – Poroshenko complained.
Recall that foreign partners of Ukraine have previously unconditionally implemented Ukrainian sanctions against certain persons, but today this figure has dropped sharply to 15%. Reduced confidence by international partners leads to the fact that the mechanisms of sanctions used by Ukraine are increasingly used for their intended purpose.
Much of the sanctions decisions – up to 80% – the NSDC approved against Ukrainian citizens, can be canceled by the courts.
From a legal point of view, the imposition, introduction and implementation of the NSDC sanctions against Ukrainian citizens is a false practice, said the lawyer Alexei Shevchuk, a partner and spokesman for the Barristers Advocacy. The current legislation, even in the fact that a person poses a certain information threat to the country, does not allow the sanction to impose a sanction against that person.
Citizens of Ukraine who were under the sanctions of the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC), more and more often They turn To court to appeal such decisions, and, as practice shows, have a real chance. This is evidenced by the resonant Separate opinion Judges of the Supreme Court.
By imposing sanctions against citizens of Ukraine without court sentences and criminal proceedings, the National Security and Defense Council (NSDC) in fact replaces the whole system justice.
