“Currently, it is not about cancellation, but about a more flexible regime of curfew. And it is right: it is necessary to facilitate this administrative regime. When the law on martial law was written, it was copied: both from Soviet models and from some others. It was an abstract situation that no one seriously thought about. It was hypothetical, all these limitations”, — write on: ua.news
Currently, it is not about cancellation, but about a more flexible regime of curfew.
And it is right: it is necessary to facilitate this administrative regime. When the law on martial law was written, it was copied: both from Soviet models and from some others. It was an abstract situation that no one seriously thought about. It was hypothetical, all these restrictions that are written there.
And now it is obvious that in the current conditions, and especially in the conditions of such an energy crisis or massive shelling – what kind of curfew is there? Additional measures to ensure order at night are needed here. And a more flexible format of restrictions for the civilian population is definitely needed.
All these nighttime bans made sense in the old wars. It is already a different era, a different situation, and restrictions on the movement of people must be abolished. But I’m sure there should be restrictions on all kinds of entertainment – after all, we’re at war.
That is, a hybrid: it should not be like it was in peacetime. But people should be able to meet their basic urgent needs at night, especially at such a time.
Volodymyr Fesenko
Read us on Telegram and Sends