“The New York Times wrote that the Russian cruiser “Moscow” was noticed by Americans before flooding, and the Ukrainians were taken and flooded without consent. The Navy says the operation was performed exclusively on their own. This was reported by a spokesman for the Naval Forces of Ukraine Dmitry Pletenchuk on the air of a telecommunication. “The information you just voiced is not true. In the first”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
The New York Times wrote that the Russian cruiser “Moscow” was noticed by Americans before flooding, and the Ukrainians were taken and flooded without consent. The Navy says the operation was performed exclusively on their own.
This was reported by a spokesman for the Naval Forces of Ukraine Dmitry Pletenchuk on the air of a telecommunication.
“The information you just voiced is not true. First of all, in the context that we did not receive any coordinates on the location of the cruiser “Moscow” and the operation to destroy this flagship of the Black Sea Fleet was fully planned and exclusively executed by the Naval Forces. Of course, we agreed to draw a fire lesion with a higher management according to the subordination structure, having received the appropriate permission. And this is, of course, the Ukrainian leadership. And they struck. Therefore, information on coordination and providing accurate information and location is not true, as well as information that it had to be agreed, ”he said.
We will remind, on March 30, The New York Times wrote about the negative reaction of the United States after Ukraine defeat the missile cruiser “Moscow” on April 14, 2022. Americans were angry because they would never have agreed to such an attack because they were afraid of Russia’s reactions. And in general, Washington did not know that Ukraine had missiles capable of sinking such a ship.
The New York Times writes about other points in differences between the US and Ukraine, such as use without the permission of Western equipment in Kursk operation.
