“The month, as the stocks with cardboard in support of NABU and SAP’s independence and the appointment of the Bab Director – and record a new attempt to Bankova to block the work of the Bureau of Economic Security. And again – through the manual prosecutor’s office.”, – WRITE: www.pravda.com.ua
Already this week, Zelensky’s servants will extend a dangerous bill No. 12439 under the guise of guarantees for business. In fact, it is about the crushing of corruption business, strengthening business control by the prosecutor’s office and blocking the work of Bab.
On August 27, the law enforcement committee of the Council was classically in closed regime, which will stop the bureau.
Advertising:
Deputies want to block the possibility of investigating economic crimes for the appropriation and distortion of property without the consent of the prosecutor’s office. The prosecutor’s office becomes “watchful” for business crimes, because it receives the right to block criminal proceedings against “their” and vice versa to enter information to the ERDR for pressure.
In fact, the Law No. 12439 is another attempt to destroy the Bab.
It was already when the office tried to destroy the independence of NABU and SAP. In the same way, they try to put the bebb under the control of the prosecutor’s office.
New trap under the guarantee of “Guarantees for Business” Traditionally, before the vote of the bill before the second reading, a bomb of slow action appears. The comparative table with dangerous edits was only published, while on the agenda the bill on September 2-3.
What is the edition of?
People’s deputies suggest that only the head of the prosecutor’s office contributes to the ERDR.
What does this mean:
- Bab will not be able to investigate economic crimes on appropriation and waste of property under Art. 191 without the consent of the prosecutor’s office. Only the Prosecutor General, his deputies or heads of regional prosecutors will be able to open the case;
- Prosecutors receive a lever control over economic crimes, their investigation or blocking the investigation;
- Bab is transformed into a passive statist that is not entitled to start an investigation without sanction from above.
In practice, this will allow you to “need” – close your eyes and not open criminal cases.
With whom to make and who to press on – will decide the prosecutor’s office controlled by the bank. Instead, the work of Bab, which became independent for the first time, is blocked.
Why it is dangerous In fact, the bebb is put again on the chain and all the achievements of the transparent competition can turn into scenery.
The bureau will not even be able to start an investigation into a corruption business if the prosecutor’s office is opposed.
In other words, it is about the continuation of the “handling” of business through the non -reached prosecutor’s office.
Bankova creates new opaque business rules for business: “Friends – everything, enemies – law.” And the main ones in this game are prosecutors, who have been trying to expand the powers since the appointment of Prosecutor General Kravchenko since the appointment of the Attorney General. If not due to NABU and the SAP, now the bebb. We have a risk of rollback to the time of Pshonka when the prosecutor decides everything.
PS The struggle for bebb was rather not like reform, but to the Olympic Games. Relay with manipulations in the commission, marathons of background arrangements, jumping through the “red lines” of the bank. And in spite of all these obstacles, the finish took place: Alexander Tsvinsky became the director of the Bureau of Economic Security – legally appointed, after an open competition. It seemed to be a victory: a chance to restart, to a new start for an institution that has been in a coma for years.
But the authorities are not ready to release from the control of the baby. As soon as the body was able to restart – the parliamentary corridors have already prepared a new attack.
The greatest cynicism is what is after a wave of rallies with cardboard in support of the independence of anti -corruption institutions.
Martin Boguslavts
A column is a material that reflects the author’s point of view. The text of the column does not claim the objectivity and comprehensive coverage of the topic that rises in it. The editorial board of “Ukrainian Truth” is not responsible for the accuracy and interpretation of the information provided and plays only the role of the carrier. The point of view of the UP editorial board may not coincide with the point of view of the author of the column.