“The homeowner refused to repay the debt to DTEK in 165 910 hryvnias, DTEK employees recorded in the house of the citizen the fact of unauthorized connection to the power system. The owner was calculated the volume and cost of used but not documented electricity due to offenses. The total amount was UAH 165 910, but it rejected the requirements to pay the debt. This information is published in the decision of the Amur-Nizhnodniprovsky District Court […]”, – WRITE: Businessua.com.ua
The homeowner refused to repay the debt to DTEK in 165 910 UAH
DTEK’s employees recorded the fact of unauthorized connection to the power system. The owner was calculated the volume and cost of used but not documented electricity due to offenses. The total amount was UAH 165 910, but it rejected the requirements to pay the debt. This information was published in the decision of the Amur-Nizhnodniprovsky District Court of Dnipro of August 11, 2025.
On May 11, 2024, representatives of JSC “DTEK Dniprovsky Electricity” registered and issued an act of violation of the requirements of paragraph 8.2.5 of the Rules: illegal connection of electrical appliances and wiring to the company networks with a deviation of the accounting scheme. On June 25, 2024, the consumer was invited to a meeting of the OSR commission, where it was decided to calculate in accordance with PP. 8.4.13 Pruree. Pursuant to Section 8.4 of these Rules, he was determined by the amount and amount of unusual electricity at UAH 165 910.
In response to the claim, the man denied the claim, emphasizing that, as the owner of the dwelling, he did not carry out unlawful actions. He noted that the charges of the company are groundless: there is no evidence of connection of devices to the power grid, there was no justification of the period for the calculation of unaccounted energy, and the total amount was recognized as fuzzy. On this basis, he demanded a complete refusal to satisfy the claim.
The course of the case The court found that the decision of the commission №51/24 of 25.06.2024, the act on violation of the rules of the electricity market of 11.05.2024 was considered. The commission identified the accrual of neo -energy for the period from November 11, 2023 to May 11, 2024. Documents on the amount of debt and the minutes of the commission were sent to the defendant by registered letter.
According to Art. 526 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, obligations should be fulfilled in accordance with the contractual conditions and legislation. Art. 610 of the CC determines that a violation is a non -fulfillment or improper performance of obligations. As provided by Art. 625 of the Civil Code, the debtor is not released from liability even in case of impossibility of fulfilling a monetary obligation. Art. 1166 of the CC obliges to compensate for property damage in full. According to Art. 89 of the CPC, the court evaluates the evidence, based on a comprehensive analysis of their accuracy and sufficiency.
Judicial verdict The court partially satisfied the claims of JSC DTEK Dniprovsky Electricity Nettle. The defendant will be charged 165 910 UAH for unaccounted electricity consumption.
“The court concluded that the plaintiff’s claims have a legal basis. The defendant did not provide evidence that would significantly change the assessment of the calculation provided by the plaintiff or denied the fact of the violation, ”the decision noted.
The gun
Please wait …