“Logo text-midnight annunocment on july 1, paramount Global said it would Pay $ Kamala Harris. THEN, 16 Hours Later, The Story Took Another Turn Who The New York Post’s Charles Gasparino Reported”, – WRITE: www.hollywoodReporter.com
In a near-midnight AnnounCement on July 1, Paramount Global Said It Wound Pay $ 16 Million “In Total” to Settle A Lawsuit From President Trump, Who Sued Over An Interview. 60 minutes Conducted with Kamala Harris. THEN, 16 Hours Later, The Story Took Another Turn Who New York Post‘s charles gasparino reported that there was also a “side deal” that helped seal the pact wortha up to $ 20 million of production Clarifying that It Wasn’t Aware of Such Terms. And if it is get any more Opaque, Trump Later ConfirMed Murmurs of the Seemingly Backroom Settlement by Saying He’d Receive Millions in Advertising from the.
SO WHAT EXACTLY DOES THE DEAL ENTAIL? IT’s A Question Two Top House Democrats have launched An investigation Into, Specifically Whtcher Skydance Offered A Side Deal In Exchange for the FCC’s Blecking of the Merger.
“This appears to be a government of office out of Payment and Benefits to Achiev Autcome from the Government – in Other Words, A BRIBE, Wrote Repps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Frank Plone of New Jersey in a Letter to David Ellison, CEO of Paramount Skydance.
Thus Far, Paramount Has Denied CLAIMS THAT INCLUDES PUBLIC SERVICE ANNUNCENTS AND SAID IT “HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF Any Promises or Commitments Made Trump. I Maintaned that the terms of the deal “are Those Discored By Us” in the July 1 Announcement.
The Same Goes for Shari Redstone and Skydance, Whose Lawyer at The Law Firm Latham & Watkins Reached Out to The Ex-Studio Mogul to Say that Catter of A Side Deal. Stewart in The New York Times.
At the Same Time, Ellison is Playing Coy. Gasparino Got The First Question at the Aug. 7 Manhattan Press Conference with Ellison, Asking About the Alleged Side Deal. The incoming C-Suite Responed that Him and His Team Weren’s Involved With The Settlement in Any Way. His Execs Also Declined to Answer Whoer or There’s Another Agreement with Trump.
“We’re Ready to Move Past the Noise,“ Ellison Added. “I’m Excited to Put My Head Down and Do the Work and Build This Business with This Remarkable Team Up Here, Not Sit Up There and Talk About, Basically, Howly.
The Politicization Ellison Points to Involves Multiple Conversations He Had with Trump Leading up to the FCC’s Approval of the Merger, not to Mention The Private Meetings His Father Hader Had Wind. Possible Bidder for Tiktok. In june, Ellison and Trump Were Seen Chatting Ringside at an UFC Event in Newark, New Jersey. Within Days of Discussion, Trump Had Endorsed Ellison’s Bid to Acquire Paramount – A Point The Lawmakers Raise in Their Letter, Wich Cites AgretEMENTS Between Paramon Containing Declarations that they haven’e Englished in bribery.
“Given your acts, it is figicult to see how ths of agroements have not alreamy been beaured,“ Repps. Raskin and Pallone Wrote. They areking for a copy of the settlement, as well as communications Between Skydance and Trump’s Team Related to the Merger.
In the wake of reports earlier it suummer that paramount wold Settle What Widha Widly Believed to be a Frivoles Lawsuit, There Was Chatter of Shareholder Lawsuits Alleging A BRE. The Other Side Was Much Less Discussed: There’s A Good Case to Be Made That Paramount’s Board of Directors Owed IT to Investors to Whatever It Took to Push the Deal Trough.
“I Believed It Was Always in Paramount’s Best Interest to Settle,” Redstone Said in An Interview with The Times. “We May Not Like The World We Live In, But A Board Has to Do What’s in the Best Interest of Shareholders.”
Does that duty to shareholders expantylylyelylyelyudicial efforts to Lay a Pathway to regulatory Approval of the Merger in the Form of a Side Deal Between Skydance And Trump. It Depends on How The Question is Framed and Who’s Asked. If there is an agreement for free advertising, Ellison would likely that’s that’s separeate and apart from the 60 minutes Settlement. And Since Paramount Wasn’s Involved in Those Discussions, It Can Claim Ignality, As Can Skydance, WHICH HAS YET to DIRECTLY CONTRADICT TRUMP ON THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
In Respons to a Letter for Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sandie Sanders of Vermont Suggesting Any Additional Compensation in the Form of Advertising from Skydance Could Amount To A Bribe McKinnon Didn’t Deny There’s A Side Deal, Only That Company “Was Neither A Party to The Lawsuit Nor to Paramount’s Settlement of It Litigation with The President.”
Reading in Between the Lines: A Side Deal, IF IT EXISTS, MAY ONLY Be Solely Between Ellison and Trump. Indeed, Trump’s Legal Team Insted to The Times that there was an unwritten understanding Between the pair.
“I HOPE IT ISN’T TRUE,” REDSTONE SAID IN ANI INTERVIEW for the Story.
And if it turns out to be True that paramount Skydance Will Run Programming in Support of Conservative Cause Backed by Trump, that Doesn’t Necessarily Mean. On immigration or diversity. HyPothetically, they Could Already Be Running, Hiding in Plain Sight.