“Football.ua evaluates the actions of the players of Donetsk Shakhtar in the match of the UEFA Europa League.”, – WRITE: Football.ua
Football.ua evaluates the actions of the players of Donetsk Shakhtar in the match of the UEFA Europa League.
Football.ua evaluates the game of football players of Donetsk Shakhtar in the match at the city. Henry Reiman (on a 10-point scale).
Shakhtar Donetsk
Dmitry Raznik – 8.0. There is no, for what to reproach Shakhtar’s goalkeeper after this two -match confrontation against Panatinaikos. Although this time the difference did not make such stunning sews as it was in Athenians. He could also save a series of penalties for his team, but those who punched their task were much worse.
Vinisius Tobias – 7.5. One of the main drivers in the Miners’ attack was the right defender this evening, who could also become the author of a decisive goal, if he had not been flicked. And in general, tobias, contrary to the previous experience, spent a holistic match both in defense and in attack.
Valery Bondar (7.0) – Mykola Matvienko (7.0) – 7.0. The Defense Center of Donetsk also did not give way to rivals in this two -match duel. Although not without unnecessary nerves, but Bondar and Matvienko prove that if they play at full concentration, then this couple can really blind something completely like reliable. And in fact, Panatinaikos had who to attack on the edge, but we are unlikely to remember the names of these players.
Pedrigno Azevedo – 6.5. Shakhtar’s left flank defender also gave a considerable amount of running work on its part, but in terms of attack, Pederinho’s decision was desired. He remembered, except, that an unexpected blow from a sharp angle in hoping for a bad reaction Dronghovsky in the second half. And, of course, the decisive penalty is also on the account of this Brazilian.
Oleg Ocheretko – 5,0. The “murderer” of Shakhtar’s chances in this duel of the reference midfielder is unlikely to be called, because the team in the minority managed to create more goal moments in a couple of minutes, than it was in the second half. However, the removal of the reed was the same restrictive factor that did not allow the Greeks to be squeezed into Overtime, to which they were obviously not too ready if they had to run for equal warehouses for another half an hour. At the same time, by its nature, the foul of Oleg on the second yellow was the classic action of the supporter, so did the episode of such a decision needed?
Marlon – 6.5. The full match of another Shakhtar support this time was able to play if you take a context for 90 minutes, but at the beginning of the overdignim it had to be replaced. It is not surprising – Marlon does a lot of shadow work on the audience, so we do not see the same Brazilian in his attacking role. Instead, it bites in defense, as far as the complexion permits, and creates something from depth.
Artem Bondarenko – 6.0. It was not allowed to reveal the opponents to the central midfielder of Shakhtar, although Bondarenko spent all the game time in the field. Even the penalty in the series was able to realize, but the overall impression of Artem’s game was again neutral.
Alysson – 6.5. Not so active this time was the right flank of Shakhtar, from which, probably, one could expect to intercepts leadership skills after Kevin’s departure due to injury. But Alysson found his moment at the end of the main time and, unfortunately, was bending.
Kauan Elias – 7.0. Shakhtar striker all managed to hate for a failed blow in the post -match penalty series, through which the player can be characterized by only one Ukrainian word – Zhevzhik. Or pajone, who is more comfortable. And this fault actually crosses all those successful actions of Elias in the course of 120+ game minutes, which have actually been collected. The forward may have not often appeared on the edge of the attack, but its players were impressed by their partners. But they will still remember the unsuccessful penalty.
Neverton – 7.5. Replace Kevin. This may be a non -arrogant task for the whole season in the near future, but so far we look only separately for these three games, and we can conclude that the Brazilian is on the right track. If something of the moments with an offSaid goal and a stroke of the head in a rack two meters from the empty gate would be in the net, a non -arrival would be a hero of the evening. He even in a penalty series made a successful attempt to join this process, but the partners after him were unsuccessful.
Yegor Nazarina – 5.0. The first replacement from Turan for 101 minutes of the game. For such a calendar with constant trips that miner has is a fantasy. But the staffing potential of the bench reserve left much to be desired, and in particular Nazarin also had health problems. But Yegor was thrown into battle, and he managed to remember his active actions even in overtime. But his main contribution to the unsuccessful result for the team, undoubtedly, was only ahead.
Marian Swede – This duel could turn in the first part of the miner at the expense of a goal moment of the Ukrainian in the last minutes of the game in Athens. And Turan again threw Mariana to battle, but at the end of extra time, although he was rumored before the game about possible damage. But the Swede never had time to create anything in the game time, and in the penalty series it did not come to his blow.
Do you want to learn about the main football news first? Subscribe to our Channel in Telegram! You can also follow our site on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.