“The appointment of Ruslan Kravchenko was the general prosecutor on the background of preparing an attack against the anti -corruption bodies of NABU and SAP. Kravchenko gave its role. About it writes “Ukrainian Truth”. The 35-year-old Kravchenko was appointed at the moment when the President’s office was already known about the probable suspicion of the Minister Alexei Chernyshov-after searches conducted by NABU and SAP in May. “It is those days”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Appointment of Ruslan Kravchenko by the Prosecutor General occurred against the backdrop of preparing an attack against anti -corruption organs NABU and SAP. Kravchenko gave its role.
He writes about it “Ukrainian Truth”.
The 35-year-old Kravchenko was appointed at the moment when the President’s office was already known about the probable suspicion of the Minister Alexei Chernyshov-after searches conducted by NABU and SAP in May.
“It was in those days when Chernyshov was already abroad and was not going to return, Kravchenko’s final meeting with the state leadership in PP. The first project to discuss with Kravchenko was … the destruction of the independence of the anti -corruption system. “Think about how”– in such a soft but quite understandable form, the tasks of the youngest prosecutor General in the history of Ukraine ”were voiced” ”– the edition writes.
It is noted that the initiator of the process of UP sources is called Presidential Office Andrew Ermak. Kravchenko himself, according to these data, during the meeting he agreed that he would “pull” the project offered to him.
According to the UE interlocutors, the case of Chernyshov could be a catalyst for Bankova. Sources familiar with searches say that personal photos with the President and his children were found on the Minister’s phone. This fact, according to law enforcement officers, has become an argument for to go into attack against NABU.
On the day of Kravchenko’s appointment, the sources in law enforcement agencies spread information that one of his first steps would be Chernyshov’s case from the jurisdiction of NABU to the Presidential Body Office.
Kravchenko denied it publicly. But, according to representatives of anti -corruption structures, the control of NABU and SAP, due to the change of legislation, could allow not to transfer the case – but to manage it from the inside.
Signs of possible political motivation journalists of the UP also saw in the case of the People’s Deputy from the group “Trust” of Robert Gorwat. According to the UE in the SAP, he earlier concluded an agreement with the investigation into the case of land seizure in Transcarpathia. However, shortly after Kravchenko, the deputy refused to sign the agreement, stating that “Klimenko (SAP – UP) will soon be harvested.”
On July 22, Horvat voted as for Bill No. 12414 for deprivation of independence of SAP and NABUas well as Kravchenko’s appointment. According to the UP, nine more of the “trust” deputies were pressed with him. Sources in the Verkhovna Rada are associated with political agreements: loyalty in vote in exchange on the impact on the course of investigations.
Despite the fact that Kravchenko has publicly stated that he learned about the new powers to NABU and SAP after voting-from telegrams, the sources in the anti-corruption community are questioned.
We will remind, the SBU was detained by Ruslan Magamedrasulov – one of the heads of NABU detectives, who was engaged in documenting the activity of businessman Timur Mindic, close to the President of Ukraine.
Now, before the vote for the return of independence, the National Anti -Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti -Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP), some MPs demand guarantees that, after changing the law, the anti -corruption authorities will not initiate an investigation against those who supported the NABU and NAPU.