“Zelensky will receive his third premiere today – Yulia Sviridenko. After the cartoon hero of Dumas novels, a romantic activist of Goncharuk, jewelry bureaucrat of the manager Shmigal now-the workaholic-distinction of Sviridenko. Sviridenko is the kind of girl who all you, dear pads, familiar with the patterns”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Zelensky will receive his third premiere today – Yulia Sviridenko.
After the cartoon hero of Dumas novels, a romantic activist of Goncharuk, jewelry bureaucrat of the manager Shmigal now-the workaholic-distinction of Sviridenko.
Sviridenko is the kind of girl who all you, expensive twigs, familiar with the patterns of school behavior: always sits on the first desk, gives everyone writing off, carefully writing handles of different colors the teacher’s synopsis in a thick notebook and inevitably solves a complex problem with an asterisk. Once upon a time, I said one politician: a man is judged by his women, and the president is for his prime ministers. It concerned Kuchma, who changed them as dirty gloves after a political mud, where his premieres were brought.
Why Zelensky has chosen Sviridenko is not news for anyone: she is a systematic technology. The maximum loyalty, perfect in the emphasized form, tactful understanding of its status, deep disgust to the media chic, maneuverable operating obsession, which causes wild admiration for lazy men who are immersed in the shaggy political struggle.
I agree that the office did not particularly prepare the society for a random premiere. But Ukrainians will positively perceive the New Yulia because of the power of women’s archetypes in the mentality. In the war, the figure of a host woman is as a lack of a powerful pantheon with an international president or a defender.
Women’s figures in the public sphere during the hot war are always a reference to a life that goes on. But this calculation was dominated, of course, when choosing Sviridenko’s candidacy. So coincided in the calculated power combination, caused by the desire to record a new internal political ratio.
Everyone can really be convinced that Sviridenko is not exactly about politics, but here and can suddenly be killed with a smile “Cat Shredinger”. The more Sviridenko hides from traumatic media, the greater the excitement she will catch up with her and wrap her with natural attention. And attention is a capital capable of chemical reaction with human images, thoughts, archetypes to multiply into a completely political reality. Where everyone thinks that Yulia Sviridenko is a typical “shmigal in the skirt”, can be wrong.
Sviridenko is a completely organic electoral image. Its female adaptability, procedural vigor, sophisticated modesty, eyepiece technocraticity have a chance to attract the voter’s eye automatically. Under other conditions, Sviridenko would have every chance of becoming a vivid politician, although she lost her first elections to the Chernihiv City Council in 2015. The lost election is an indispensable attribute for further success.
It is clear that the war will still make its accounts for those who were destined to manage the country in its conditions. The premiere should only wish mastery to minimize its negative consequences for the wounded society.
Oleg Posternak