“Sanctions against Expature Petro Poroshenko were imposed on the basis of information from the new head of the State Financial Monitoring of Philip Pronin. And these data were classified, so they will not be challenged in court. About it writes Zn.ua with reference to sources. According to the publication, the government’s meeting was reported by the Minister of Economy Yulia Sviridenko, not the Minister of Finance Sergey Marchenko, although financial monitoring is a member of the Ministry of Finance.”, – WRITE ON: ua.news
Sanctions against Expature Petro Poroshenko were imposed on the basis of information from the new head of the State Financial Monitoring of Philip Pronin. And these data were classified, so they will not be challenged in court.
About it writes Zn.ua with reference to sources.
According to the publication, the government’s meeting was reported by the Minister of Economy Yulia Sviridenko, not the Minister of Finance Sergey Marchenko, although financial monitoring is a member of the Ministry of Finance.
Sviridenko, not Prime Minister Denis Shmigal, signed a petition to the NSDC against Poroshenko’s sanctions.
In addition, the Security Service of Ukraine was opposed to the introduction of these sanctions, ZN.ua writes, citing a source in the NSDC.
According to the publication, a meeting on sanctions against five people – Petro Poroshenko, Igor Kolomoisky, Gennady Bogolyubov, Konstantin Zhevago and Viktor Medvedchuk – was planned on January 3-5. However, the head of the SBU Vasyl Malyuk “refused” about Poroshenko.
According to ZN.ua, the baby team prepared for President Vladimir Zelensky a note of 10 points, where she painted all the risks of such a step regarding Poroshenko: dubious legality of this decision, internal confrontation in society, parliamentary crisis, reaction of international partners, etc.
“No one considers Peter Alekseevich white and fluffy, in addition to the pipe – in the SBU. But against the backdrop of external challenges to split society is a very risky and short -sighted step. The baby understood it perfectly and did not take the initiative. Zelensky did not ask this request to the SBU with this request, ”said the interlocutor of the SBU.
Petro Poroshenko stated that his attorneys were sent to the financial monitoring with the question of what facts were the basis for the use of sanctions. However, according to Zn.ua, these financial monitoring data are classified. That is, in court it will not be possible to appeal the sanctions on the merits, but solely about the violation of the procedure.
On February 12, the National Security and Defense Council made a decision on sanctions against the 5th President Petro Poroshenko. He is being abused by Russia.
The leader of “European Solidarity” Petro Poroshenko confirmed that on his information he was on the new sanction list, approved on February 12 at the NSDC. He called it a “tremendous blow on inner unity” and called on “to rally around the military.”
Poroshenko is preparing to challenge the Supreme Court sanctions that the NSDC against him on February 12.
The Prosecutor General’s office informed the details of criminal proceedings against well -known businessmen and former high -ranking officials, against whom the NSDC applied personal sanctions on February 12.
The NSDC decision to introduce economic sanctions to the oligarchs of Petro Poroshenko, Igor Kolomoisky, Gennady Bogolyubov, Konstantin Zhevago and Viktor Medvedchuk allows to stop the shadow financial schemes, which lasted for decades, said the Head of the State Financial Monitoring Service Philip Pronin.
