“He strongly condemned NATO’s “aggression” on behalf of Medvedchuk Party – expert found the speech by the People’s Deputy Poroshenko in the Supreme radispert found Poroshenko’s speech since 1999, where he condemned NATO’s actions during the events in the previous Yugoslavia. Oleshchuk points to a constant change in Poroshenko’s political views depending on the situation.”, – WRITE ON: Unn.ua
According to him, in 1999, Petro Poroshenko, as a deputy and a member of the pro -Russian Party of Medvedchuk SDPU (O), categorically condemned the “Aggression of the NATO Bloc” during the events in the former Yugoslavia.
“The fracture of the SDPU (o) rebellively is the aggressive acts on the reference of warrior “, says Poroshenko’s transcript with a pure In Russian at the 32nd meeting of the Verkhovna Rada, which was held on March 26, 1999, Petro Oleshchuk.
Oleshchuk emphasizes that for some time Poroshenko began to contradict himself, conjuncturally by NATO support.
The constant change in Poroshenko’s political position testifies to his cynical property to mimic the owners’ interests: under Putin, whom he traded; or Yanukovych, before which he was in his government, etc. But in the pursuit of his own interests, Poroshenko did not leave the interests of the state. After all, it will take many years, Ukraine will finally change its foreign policy vector, abandoning relations with Russia. Only Poroshenko will business with Medvedchuk, trade with the Russian Federation, support the ROC, lobby for Novinsky’s citizenship and press Putin’s hand. But the rhetoric about NATO, the Hetman will adjust the conjuncture agreement
In turn, Oleshchuk is wondering what Poroshenko’s position is.
“I wonder when Poroshenko was lying: when he said that NATO is an enemy of Ukraine, or now, when he shouts that NATO is a signpost? Although not interesting. Because such as he is lying always,” the expert sums up .
As it was reported earlier, Petro Poroshenko is offered sanctions. The relevant petition is registered on the website of the President of Ukraine. Petition authors emphasize that the activities of politics have caused significant harm to the country’s national interests. The grounds for sanctions against Petro Poroshenko are the authors of the petition in the creation of a Party of Regions, work in the government of Mykola Azarov, links with representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church and a business that paid taxes in the Russian Federation even after the war.