“Far from making zero-knowledge rollups obsolete, the Beam Chain would make them work better, says Polygon. zkSync builder Matter Labs is also bullish.”, — write: www.coindesk.com
What’s good for the L1 is good for the L2s.
That’s the assessment the teams behind zkSync and Polygon, two of the leading layer-2 networks running on top of Ethereum, gave of a recent proposal to overhaul the $400 billion blockchain, dismissing suggestions it would make their auxiliary networks redundant.
01:56
Bitcoin Nears $100K as BTC Battles Pullback with Bullish Sentiment
14:15
The Comeback of Bitcoin Programmability Like ‘Renaissance’: Portal VC Founder
02:35
Trump Considers Crypto Lawyer for SEC Chair, Picks Howard Lutnick for Commerce Secretary
01:25
Bitcoin Posts New ATH Amid BlackRock’s IBIT Options Launch
Last week, at the biennial Devcon gathering in Bangkok, Thailand, developer Justin Drake laid out an ambitious plan to revamp Ethereum’s consensus layer architecture. As part of that plan, which has come to be known as the “Beam Chain,” Drake suggested incorporating zero-knowledge cryptography, which several L2s use to compress data in order to make transactions faster and cheaper, into the Ethereum protocol.
Over the past few years, many in the Ethereum ecosystem have pushed a rollup-centric roadmap, meaning they would rely on layer-2 networks to overcome Ethereum’s scaling challenges. Zero-knowledge rollups specifically were seen as the superior technology because they have advantages over so-called optimistic rollups in terms of speed and security.
Ahead of Drake’s Devcon talk, many were left wondering what the Beam Chain would mean for the zero-knowledge rollups on Ethereum, and whether they would become obsolete.
“That’s really a misconception,” said Alex Gluchowski, the CEO of Matter Labs, the developer firm behind zkSync. “The changes that Justin announced are focused on the consensus layer, not on the execution layer. It’s not going to affect the execution layer.”
Ethereum, the base layer, is itself made up of several layers. The consensus layer is responsible for ensuring that blocks are validated, while the execution layer is in charge of executing transactions. Layer-2s, which post their transaction data back to Ethereum, are mostly affected by changes on the execution layer.
In addition to incorporating ZK, Drake’s proposal seeks to shorten block times, which could cut transaction costs for L2s settling on Ethereum. Drake also said he wants to introduce single-slot finality, meaning blocks with transaction data could be finalized immediately, and that information would become permanent right away. If all goes as envisioned, the Beam Chain would go live in 2029 (although Ethereum has a history of delaying ambitious technical upgrades.)
“All of those things are great because we depend on Ethereum as the global settlement layer,” Gluchowski said.
:format(jpg)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindesk/4SQKSMI6MVBRNJY4RCMMFJMJ2Y.png)
Beam Chain timeline according to Justin Drake (Ethereum Foundation livestream)Glow-Up for Rollups?
Brendan Farmer, a co-founder at Polygon, also told CoinDesk he doesn’t think the Beam Chain would obsolesce layer-2s. Instead, he said, the upgrade would “make rollups work better.”
“Shorter block times, faster finality, ZK verifiability of what’s happening on the consensus layer – those are things that I think have a really positive impact for L2 usability and for L2 interoperability between different ecosystems,” Farmer said.
Faster finality on Ethereum would be especially useful for making layer-2s interoperable, a widely shared goal for scaling networks.
“A big problem with Ethereum right now is that for a block to be considered finalized, it generally takes 12 to 19 minutes,” Farmer said. “If you’re moving funds between like Arbitrum and Polygon: until that transaction has been withdrawn from Arbitrum and deposited to Polygon, Polygon can’t safely credit those funds to a user until that transaction has been finalized on the L1. So that just leads to a bad user-experience, whereas if you have 12-second finality, that becomes a better user experience.”
Gluchowski of Matter Labs called the Beam Chain a vindication of zero-knowledge proofs as a scaling method.
“Using ZK really emphasizes the fact that ZK is the end game,” he said.
Edited by Marc Hochstein.
Disclosure
Please note that our
privacy policy,
terms of use,
cookies,
and
do not sell my personal information
have been updated
.
CoinDesk is an
award-winning
media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of
editorial policies.
CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
:format(jpg)/author-service-images-prod-us-east-1.publishing.aws.arc.pub/coindesk/7dc71a1a-5122-47cc-9bbf-82501f65b060.png)
Margaux Nijkerk reports on the Ethereum protocol and L2s. A graduate of Johns Hopkins and Emory universities, she has a masters in International Affairs & Economics. She holds ETH above CoinDesk’s disclosure threshold of $1,000.
Follow @cryptauxmargaux on Twitter