“On January 15, the court will begin considering the merits of the claim of the owner of “Gulliver” Polishchuk to ARMA due to the Duma’s statement about the businessman’s Russian connections (VIDEO) businessman”, — write on: unn.ua
Details
Viktor Polishchuk appealed to the court with a claim against ARMA for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation. In the comment UNN the businessman explained that such a step was forced due to the public statement of the head of the agency Elena Duma that he and his wife had “close relations with the Kremlin leadership”. Polishchuk emphasized that this information is fictitious and does not correspond to reality.
The head of ARMA Olena Duma in response to a request UNN explained that she accused Polishchuk and his wife of connections with the “Kremlin elite” because she saw such information in the mass media.
The court initially set a hearing for October 10, but the defendant’s lawyer failed to provide a document confirming that he has the authority to represent ARMA in court. Therefore, the meeting was postponed to November 14.
Today, the court session finally took place. Representatives of Viktor Polishchuk and ARMA reported that, having fully familiarized themselves with the materials of the case, the court decided “to close the preparatory court session and appoint the case for consideration on the merits.” The first meeting is scheduled for January 15.
Let’s add
Viktor Polishchuk’s openness to public defense of his honor, dignity and business reputation due to the official’s statement about his possible Russian connections interested journalists. After researching this topic, it was found that the information that the wife of Viktor Polishchuk, Lilia Rizva, is allegedly the niece of the wife of the Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev, appeared in 2015-2016. It was spread by the then current People’s Deputy Pavlo Ryzanenko in his blogs, but he never added proof of this information. UNN asked Ryzanenko to provide documents that would confirm his assumptions, but he refused to comment, citing the fact that he has not been a public figure since 2019.
It can be assumed that this reaction of Ryzanenko is caused by the fact that he really has nothing to provide to confirm the widespread theses, and he simply “worked out” his goals in 2015-2016.