“The Apparent Stand-Off Mirrors that of Wazirx and Liminal Custody, WHICH BLAMED EACH Other Following A $ 230 Million Exploit Last July.”, – WRITE: www.coindesk.com
Bybit Concluded from the Review “The Credntentials of a SAFE DEELOPER WERE COMPROMISED,” WHICH ALLOWED THE LAZARUSSARU Staff Into Signing The Malicious Transaction.
However, A Person Familiar with The Matter Told Coindesk That Despite The Wallet’s Infrastructure Being Compromisened by Social Engineering, The Hack Wuld Not Have Been “The a Theater. The Term Refers to A Mechanism WHERE A SMART Contract Transaction is Approved Without ComprehenSive Knowledge of Its Contents.
SAFE ALSO IssUED A STATEMENT SAYING THAT “SAFE SMART CONTRACTS [were] unaffected, an attacker was conducked by compromising a safe {Wallet} Developer Machine Whofe Affected An Account Operated Bybit. DID NOT INDICATE Any VULNABILITIES IN THE SAFE SMART CONTRACTS or Source Code of the Frontend and Service. ”
The Apparent Back and Forte Between Both Companies Mirrors that of Wazirx and Liminal Custody, WHICH BLAMED EACH Other Following A $ 230 Million Exploit Last July.
On -chain Data Analyzed by Zachxbt Shows that lazarus is attempting to launder the Stolen Funds, with 920 Wallets Currently Being Tainted with the Ill-Gotten Gains. The Funds, Perhaps Inadvertently, Have Been Communication with Stolen FROMDS from Hacks Targeting Phemex and Poloniex, Linking Lazarus Group to All Three.
Read More: Bybit Declares ‘War On Lazarus’ As It CrowdSources Effort to Freeze Stolen Funds
X Icon
